SEIC-9.30.14-10Q


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 ________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
________________________________________
 
(Mark One)*
ý
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
or
¨
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from              to             
0-10200
(Commission File Number)
________________________________________ 
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________ 
Pennsylvania
 
23-1707341
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
1 Freedom Valley Drive, Oaks, Pennsylvania 19456-1100
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(610) 676-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 ________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
ý
Accelerated filer
¨
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of October 21, 2014 was 167,235,919.




SEI Investments Company

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) -- September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) -- For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) -- For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) -- For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings.
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
Item 6.
Exhibits.
 
 
Signatures
 



1 of 38



PART I.        FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Consolidated Financial Statements.

SEI Investments Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except par value)

 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Assets
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
577,914

 
$
578,273

Restricted cash
5,500

 
5,500

Receivables from regulated investment companies
46,533

 
39,364

Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,038 and $651
211,228

 
186,664

Securities owned
21,173

 
21,133

Other current assets
21,028

 
16,166

Total Current Assets
883,376

 
847,100

Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $235,606 and $220,064
128,775

 
118,995

Capitalized Software, net of accumulated amortization of $208,502 and $180,062
310,368

 
312,615

Investments Available for Sale
81,084

 
83,323

Trading Securities
4,908

 
4,849

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
63,858

 
61,370

Other Assets, net
13,410

 
10,917

Total Assets
$
1,485,779

 
$
1,439,169

Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
6,512

 
$
16,235

Accrued liabilities
148,839

 
188,123

Deferred income taxes, net
1,868

 
1,653

Deferred revenue
1,098

 
1,977

Total Current Liabilities
158,317

 
207,988

Deferred Income Taxes
71,552

 
66,572

Other Long-term Liabilities
11,270

 
8,607

Total Liabilities
241,139

 
283,167

Commitments and Contingencies

 

Shareholders' Equity:
 
 
 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 750,000 shares authorized; 167,112 and 169,242 shares issued and outstanding
1,671

 
1,692

Capital in excess of par value
805,197

 
721,219

Retained earnings
440,767

 
431,604

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net
(2,995
)
 
1,487

Total Shareholders' Equity
1,244,640

 
1,156,002

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
1,485,779

 
$
1,439,169

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2 of 38



SEI Investments Company
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management, administration and distribution fees
$
244,704

 
$
208,780

 
$
705,966

 
$
611,135

Information processing and software servicing fees
70,020

 
64,606

 
215,026

 
191,606

Transaction-based and trade execution fees
7,323

 
7,269

 
22,256

 
24,367

Total revenues
322,047

 
280,655

 
943,248

 
827,108

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subadvisory, distribution and other asset management costs
39,737

 
31,209

 
110,993

 
88,795

Software royalties and other information processing costs
8,562

 
7,541

 
25,532

 
22,912

Brokerage commissions
5,119

 
5,519

 
16,217

 
18,291

Compensation, benefits and other personnel
94,316

 
89,311

 
281,210

 
264,636

Stock-based compensation
3,786

 
11,097

 
9,481

 
26,997

Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees
34,946

 
33,367

 
103,283

 
98,667

Data processing and computer related
13,555

 
12,654

 
39,553

 
37,028

Facilities, supplies and other costs
16,136

 
13,573

 
49,354

 
47,280

Amortization
9,813

 
8,829

 
28,611

 
25,498

Depreciation
5,579

 
5,616

 
16,494

 
17,050

Total expenses
231,549

 
218,716

 
680,728

 
647,154

Income from operations
90,498

 
61,939

 
262,520

 
179,954

Net (loss) gain from investments
(478
)
 
535

 
49

 
638

Interest and dividend income
750

 
679

 
2,248

 
2,420

Interest expense
(115
)
 
(195
)
 
(342
)
 
(422
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
37,963

 
31,028

 
104,080

 
86,204

Gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 
5,582

 
22,112

Other income

 

 

 
43,429

Income before income taxes
128,618

 
93,986

 
374,137

 
334,335

Income taxes
44,635

 
26,791

 
132,521

 
111,376

Net income
83,983

 
67,195

 
241,616

 
222,959

Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

 

 
(350
)
Net income attributable to SEI Investments Company
$
83,983

 
$
67,195

 
$
241,616

 
$
222,609

Basic earnings per common share
$
0.50

 
$
0.39

 
$
1.43

 
$
1.29

Shares used to compute basic earnings per share
167,925

 
171,308

 
168,612

 
172,043

Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.49

 
$
0.38

 
$
1.39

 
$
1.26

Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share
172,905

 
176,043

 
173,700

 
176,036

Dividends declared per common share
$

 
$

 
$
0.22

 
$
0.20

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3 of 38



SEI Investments Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net income
 
 
$
83,983

 
 
 
$
67,195

 
 
 
$
241,616

 
 
 
$
222,959

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
(6,308
)
 
 
 
3,146

 
 
 
(4,896
)
 
 
 
(3,961
)
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized (losses) gains during the period, net of income taxes of $330, $111, $(426) and $(701)
(584
)
 
 
 
354

 
 
 
407

 
 
 
(886
)
 
 
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in net income, net of income taxes of $(39), $23, $(1) and $(162)
76

 
(508
)
 
55

 
409

 
7

 
414

 
(287
)
 
(1,173
)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
 
 
(6,816
)
 
 
 
3,555

 
 
 
(4,482
)
 
 
 
(5,134
)
Comprehensive income
 
 
$
77,167

 
 
 
$
70,750

 
 
 
$
237,134

 
 
 
$
217,825

Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
101

Comprehensive income attributable to SEI Investments Company
 
 
$
77,167

 
 
 
$
70,750

 
 
 
$
237,134

 
 
 
$
217,926

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4 of 38



SEI Investments Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
241,616

 
$
222,959

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (See Note 1)
(721
)
 
17,336

Net cash provided by operating activities
240,895

 
240,295

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Additions to property and equipment
(26,422
)
 
(10,413
)
Additions to capitalized software
(26,193
)
 
(31,044
)
Purchases of marketable securities
(42,305
)
 
(48,653
)
Prepayments and maturities of marketable securities
27,224

 
29,462

Sales of marketable securities
18,133

 
7,284

Sale of subsidiary, net of cash transferred
5,582

 
6,028

Purchases of other investments
(2,000
)
 
(2,604
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(45,981
)
 
(49,940
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Purchase and retirement of common stock
(215,777
)
 
(144,121
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
81,426

 
54,788

Tax benefit on stock options exercised
13,372

 
8,345

Payment of dividends
(74,294
)
 
(34,400
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(195,273
)
 
(115,388
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(359
)
 
74,967

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
578,273

 
452,247

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
577,914

 
$
527,214

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5 of 38



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(all figures are in thousands except share and per share data)
 
Note 1.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
SEI Investments Company (the Company), a Pennsylvania corporation, provides investment processing, investment management, and investment operations solutions to financial institutions, financial advisors, institutional investors, investment managers and ultra-high-net-worth families in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, continental Europe and various other locations throughout the world. Investment processing solutions consist of application and business process outsourcing services, professional services and transaction-based services. Revenues from investment processing solutions are recognized in Information processing and software servicing fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, except for fees earned associated with trade execution services which are recognized in Transaction-based and trade execution fees.
Investment management programs consist of mutual funds, alternative investments and separate accounts. These include a series of money market, equity, fixed-income and alternative investment portfolios, primarily in the form of registered investment companies. The Company serves as the administrator and investment advisor for many of these products. Revenues from investment management programs are recognized in Asset management, administration and distribution fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Investment operations solutions offer investment managers support for traditional investment products such as mutual funds, collective investment trusts, exchange-traded funds, and institutional and separate accounts, by providing outsourcing services including fund and investment accounting, administration, reconciliation, investor servicing and client reporting. These solutions also provide support to managers focused on alternative investments who manage hedge funds, funds of hedge funds, private equity funds and real estate funds, across registered, partnership and separate account structures domiciled in the United States and overseas. Revenues from investment operations solutions are recognized in Asset management, administration and distribution fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain financial information and accompanying note disclosure normally included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K has been condensed or omitted. The interim financial information is unaudited but reflects all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2014, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. These interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
There have been no significant changes in significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes $374,292 and $387,201 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, primarily invested in SEI-sponsored open-ended money market mutual funds. The SEI-sponsored mutual funds are considered Level 1 assets.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes $5,000 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 segregated for regulatory purposes related to trade-execution services conducted by SEI Investments (Europe) Limited. Restricted cash also includes $500 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, segregated in special reserve accounts for the benefit of customers of the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, SEI Investments Distribution Co. (SIDCO), in accordance with certain rules established by the Securities and Exchange Commission for broker-dealers.
Capitalized Software
The Company capitalized $26,193 and $31,044 of software development costs for the continued development of the SEI Wealth PlatformSM (the Platform) during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Included in the amount for 2013 is a one-time contractual payment of $8,812 to exercise a conversion option in lieu of periodic fee payments pertaining to a software license for the Platform. As of September 30, 2014, the net book value of the Platform was $310,368.

6 of 38



The Platform has an estimated useful life of 15 years and a weighted average remaining life of 7.8 years. Amortization expense for the Platform was $28,345 and $25,046 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Earnings per Share
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are:
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
 
Income
(Numerator)
 
Shares
(Denominator)
 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per common share
$
83,983

 
167,925,000

 
$
0.50

Dilutive effect of stock options

 
4,980,000

 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
$
83,983

 
172,905,000

 
$
0.49


 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
 
Income
(Numerator)
 
Shares
(Denominator)
 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per common share
$
67,195

 
171,308,000

 
$
0.39

Dilutive effect of stock options

 
4,735,000

 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
$
67,195

 
176,043,000

 
$
0.38

Employee stock options to purchase 4,411,000 and 3,042,000 shares of common stock, with an average exercise price of $32.38 and $31.39, were outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on diluted earnings per common share would have been anti-dilutive.
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 are:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
 
Income
(Numerator)
 
Shares
(Denominator)
 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per common share
$
241,616

 
168,612,000

 
$
1.43

Dilutive effect of stock options

 
5,088,000

 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
$
241,616

 
173,700,000

 
$
1.39

 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
 
Income
(Numerator)
 
Shares
(Denominator)
 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per common share
$
222,609

 
172,043,000

 
$
1.29

Dilutive effect of stock options

 
3,993,000

 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
$
222,609

 
176,036,000

 
$
1.26

Employee stock options to purchase 4,416,000 and 5,522,000 shares of common stock, with an average exercise price of $32.37 and $29.22, were outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect on diluted earnings per common share would have been anti-dilutive.


7 of 38



Statements of Cash Flows
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
The following table provides the details of the adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30:
 
2014
 
2013
Net income
$
241,616

 
$
222,959

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation
16,494

 
17,050

Amortization
28,611

 
25,498

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
(104,080
)
 
(86,204
)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliate
103,592

 
109,173

Stock-based compensation
9,481

 
26,997

Provision for losses on receivables
387

 
(180
)
Deferred income tax expense
4,768

 
(21,443
)
Gain from sale of SEI AK
(5,582
)
 
(22,112
)
Net gain from investments
(49
)
 
(638
)
Change in other long-term liabilities
2,663

 
1,671

Change in other assets
(2,769
)
 
80

Other
(4,665
)
 
(4,199
)
Change in current asset and liabilities
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in
 
 
 
Restricted cash for broker-dealer operations

 
500

Receivables from regulated investment companies
(7,169
)
 
(8,495
)
Receivables
(24,951
)
 
(17,255
)
Other current assets
(4,862
)
 
(1,208
)
Increase (decrease) in
 
 
 
Accounts payable
(9,723
)
 
(3,960
)
Accrued liabilities
(1,988
)
 
3,149

Deferred revenue
(879
)
 
(1,088
)
Total adjustments
(721
)
 
17,336

Net cash provided by operating activities
$
240,895

 
$
240,295

New Accounting Pronouncements
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09), requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The updated standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 becomes effective for the Company during the first quarter 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the transition method that will be elected and the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.


8 of 38



Note 2.
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
LSV Asset Management
The Company has an investment in LSV Asset Management (LSV), a Delaware general partnership. LSV is a registered investment advisor that provides investment advisory services to institutions, including pension plans and investment companies. LSV is currently an investment sub-advisor for a small number of SEI-sponsored mutual funds. The Company accounts for its interest in LSV using the equity method because of its less than 50 percent ownership. The Company’s total partnership interest in LSV was approximately 39.3 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company's total partnership interest was reduced from approximately 39.8 percent to approximately 39.3 percent. The Company’s interest in the net assets of LSV is reflected in Investment in unconsolidated affiliates on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and its interest in the earnings of LSV is reflected in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company’s total investment in LSV was $51,956 and $50,595, respectively. The investment in LSV exceeded the underlying equity in the net assets of LSV by $3,062 which is considered goodwill embedded in the investment. The Company receives partnership distributions from LSV on a quarterly basis. The Company received partnership distributions from LSV of $103,592 and $109,173 in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company received an additional partnership distribution payment during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the current year period due to a change in the timing of the payments.
The Company’s proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $38,237 and $31,285 during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $104,953 and $86,871, respectively.
The following table contains the condensed statements of operations of LSV for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
2014
 
2013
Revenues
$
114,464

 
$
92,184

$
316,185

 
$
256,782

Net income
97,332

 
79,555

267,075

 
220,657

Guaranty Agreement with LSV Employee Group II
In April 2011, LSV Employee Group II agreed to purchase a partnership interest of an existing LSV employee for $4,300, of which $3,655 was financed through a term loan with Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America). The Company provided an unsecured guaranty to the lenders of all the obligations of LSV Employee Group II. The lenders had the right to seek payment from the Company in the event of a default by LSV Employee Group II. LSV Employee Group II made the final principal payment in May 2014 for the term loan and has no further obligation regarding the Credit Agreement. LSV Employee Group II made principal payments of $716 during 2014, including the final principal payment of $365 in May 2014.
Guaranty Agreement with LSV Employee Group III
In October 2012, LSV Employee Group III purchased a portion of the partnership interest of three existing LSV employees for $77,700, of which $69,930 was financed through two syndicated term loan facilities contained in a credit agreement with The PrivateBank and Trust Company. The Company provided an unsecured guaranty for $45,000 of the obligations of LSV Employee Group III to the lenders through a guaranty agreement. The lenders have the right to seek payment from the Company in the event of a default by LSV Employee Group III. LSV agreed to provide an unsecured guaranty for $24,930 of the obligations of LSV Employee Group III to the lenders through a separate guaranty agreement.
In September 2014, LSV Employee Group III made the final principal payment related to the term loan guaranteed by LSV. As of October 21, 2014, the remaining unpaid principal balance of the term loan guaranteed by the Company was $42,381. LSV Employee Group III has met all financial obligations to date regarding the scheduled repayment of the term loans since origination. The Company, in its capacity as guarantor, currently has no obligation of payment relating to the term loan of LSV Employee Group III and, furthermore, fully expects that LSV Employee Group III will meet all of their future obligations regarding the term loan.
Investment in Gao Fu Limited
The Company has an investment in Gao Fu Limited (Gao Fu), a wealth services firm based in Shanghai in the Republic of China. The Company accounts for its interest in Gao Fu using the equity method. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company's total investment in Gao Fu was $11,902 and $10,775, respectively. The Company's proportionate share in the losses of Gao Fu was $873 and $667 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


9 of 38



Note 3.    Variable Interest Entities – Investment Products
The Company has created numerous investment products for its clients in various types of legal entity structures. The Company serves as the Manager, Administrator and Distributor for these investment products and may also serve as the Trustee for some of the investment products. Clients are the equity investors and participate in proportion to their ownership percentage in the net income and net capital gains of the products, and, on liquidation, will participate in proportion to their ownership percentage in the remaining net assets of the products after satisfaction of outstanding liabilities. Some of the Company’s investment products have been determined to be VIEs at inception.
The Company does not have a significant equity investment in any of the VIEs and does not have an obligation to enter into any guarantee agreements with the VIEs. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs because the expected fees and the expected return on any investment into the VIE by the Company relative to the expected returns of the VIE to the equity investor holders does not approach 50 percent of the expected losses or gains of the VIEs. Therefore, the Company is not required to consolidate any investment products that are VIEs into its financial statements. The Company’s variable interest in the VIEs, which consists of management fees and in some situations, seed capital, is not considered a significant variable interest.
The risks to the Company associated with its involvement with any of the investment products that are VIEs are limited to the cash flows received from the revenue generated for asset management, administration and distribution services and any equity investments in the VIEs. Both of these items are not significant. The Company has no other financial obligation to the VIEs.
Amounts relating to fees due from the VIEs included in Receivables and amounts relating to equity investments in the VIEs included in Investments Available for Sale on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets are not significant to the total assets of the Company.

Note 4.
Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
Receivables
Receivables on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of: 
 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Trade receivables
$
67,179

 
$
44,502

Fees earned, not billed
140,030

 
128,248

Other receivables
5,057

 
14,565

 
212,266

 
187,315

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,038
)
 
(651
)
 
$
211,228

 
$
186,664

Fees earned, not billed represents receivables earned but unbilled and results from timing differences between services provided and contractual billing schedules. These billing schedules generally provide for fees to be billed on a quarterly basis. In addition, certain fees earned from investment operations services are calculated based on assets under administration that have a prolonged valuation process which delays billings to clients.
Receivables from regulated investment companies on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily represent fees receivable for distribution, investment advisory, and administration services to various regulated investment companies sponsored by SEI.

10 of 38



Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of:
 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Buildings
$
149,056

 
$
138,426

Equipment
77,078

 
70,117

Land
9,997

 
9,929

Purchased software
104,304

 
96,268

Furniture and fixtures
17,095

 
17,060

Leasehold improvements
5,536

 
4,670

Construction in progress
1,315

 
2,589

 
364,381

 
339,059

Less: Accumulated depreciation
(235,606
)
 
(220,064
)
Property and Equipment, net
$
128,775

 
$
118,995

The Company recognized $16,494 and $17,050 in depreciation expense related to property and equipment for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of: 
 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Accrued employee compensation
$
60,395

 
$
69,256

Accrued employee benefits and other personnel
7,481

 
9,647

Accrued consulting, outsourcing and professional fees
23,126

 
19,311

Accrued sub-advisory, distribution and other asset management fees
30,845

 
25,018

Accrued dividend payable

 
37,314

Other accrued liabilities
26,992

 
27,577

Total accrued liabilities
$
148,839

 
$
188,123


Note 5.    Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s Level 1 financial assets consist mainly of investments in equity and fixed-income mutual funds that are quoted daily. Level 2 financial assets consist of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) mortgage-backed pass-through certificates, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and other U.S. government agency short-term notes and investment grade commercial paper. The Company's Level 2 financial assets, with the exception of the GNMA securities, were purchased as part of a cash management program requiring only short term, top-tier investment grade government and corporate securities. The GNMA mortgage-backed pass-through certificates were purchased for the sole purpose of satisfying specific regulatory requirements imposed on our wholly-owned limited purpose federal thrift subsidiary, SEI Private Trust Company (SPTC). As a result, the Company's Level 2 financial assets are limited to only these types of fixed income securities. The valuation of the Company's Level 2 financial assets are based upon securities pricing policies and procedures utilized by third-party pricing vendors. The pricing policies and procedures applied during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were consistent with those as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K at December 31, 2013. The Company had no Level 3 financial assets or liabilities at September 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013. There were no transfers of financial assets between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

11 of 38



The fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities of the Company was determined using the following inputs:
 
At September 30, 2014
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets
Total
 
Quoted Prices
in
Active  Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Equity available-for-sale securities
$
11,804

 
$
11,804

 
$

Fixed income available-for-sale securities
69,280

 

 
69,280

Fixed income securities owned
21,173

 

 
21,173

Trading securities
4,908

 
4,908

 

 
$
107,165

 
$
16,712

 
$
90,453


 
At December 31, 2013
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets
Total
 
Quoted Prices
in
Active  Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Equity available-for-sale securities
$
11,633

 
$
11,633

 
$

Fixed income available-for-sale securities
71,690

 

 
71,690

Fixed income securities owned
21,133

 

 
21,133

Trading securities
4,849

 
4,849

 

 
$
109,305

 
$
16,482

 
$
92,823


Note 6.    Marketable Securities
Investments Available for Sale
Investments available for sale classified as non-current assets consist of: 
 
At September 30, 2014
 
Cost
Amount
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
SEI-sponsored mutual funds
$
7,634

 
$
1,388

 
$

 
$
9,022

Equities and other mutual funds
2,760

 
22

 

 
2,782

Debt securities
68,033

 
1,247

 

 
69,280

 
$
78,427

 
$
2,657

 
$

 
$
81,084

 
At December 31, 2013
 
Cost
Amount
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
SEI-sponsored mutual funds
$
7,612

 
$
1,242

 
$

 
$
8,854

Equities and other mutual funds
2,615

 
164

 

 
2,779

Debt securities
71,280

 
410

 

 
71,690

 
$
81,507

 
$
1,816

 
$

 
$
83,323

Net unrealized gains at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $1,800 (net of income tax expense of $857) and $1,386 (net of income tax expense of $430), respectively. These net unrealized gains are reported as a separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
There were gross realized gains of $238 and gross realized losses of $247 from available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There were gross realized gains of $710 and gross realized losses of $261 from

12 of 38



available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Gains and losses from available-for-sale securities, including amounts reclassified from accumulated comprehensive income, are reflected in Net (loss) gain from investments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company’s investments in debt securities are issued by GNMA and are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. These securities were purchased to satisfy applicable regulatory requirements of SPTC and have maturity dates which range from 2020 to 2043.
Trading Securities
The Company records all of its trading securities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses from the change in fair value of these securities are recognized in Net (loss) gain from investments on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Trading securities of the Company primarily consist of an investment related to the startup of mutual funds sponsored by LSV. These mutual funds are U.S. dollar denominated funds that invest primarily in securities of Canadian, Australian and Japanese companies as well as various other global securities. The underlying securities held by the funds are translated into U.S. dollars within the funds. The funds had a fair value of $4,908 and $4,849 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company recognized gains of $59 and $135 from the change in fair value of the funds during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized losses of $362 and gains of $610, respectively, from the change in fair value of the funds.
Securities Owned
The Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, SIDCO, has investments in U.S. government agency and commercial paper securities with maturity dates less than one year. These investments are reflected as Securities owned on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due to specialized accounting practices applicable to investments by broker-dealers, the securities are reported at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings. The securities had a fair value of $21,173 and $21,133 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. There were no material net gains or losses from the change in fair value of the securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Note 7.    Lines of Credit
The Company has a five-year $300,000 Credit Agreement (the Credit Facility) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and a syndicate of other lenders. The Credit Facility is scheduled to expire in February 2017, at which time any aggregate principal amount of loans outstanding becomes payable in full. Any borrowings made under the Credit Facility will accrue interest at 1.25 percent above LIBOR. There is also a commitment fee equal to 0.15 percent per annum on the daily unused portion of the facility. The aggregate amount of the Credit Facility may be increased by an additional $100,000 under certain conditions set forth in the agreement. The Credit Facility contains covenants that restrict the ability of the Company to engage in mergers, consolidations, asset sales, investments, transactions with affiliates, or to incur liens, as defined in the agreement. In the event of a default under the Credit Facility, the Company would also be restricted from paying dividends on, or repurchasing, its common stock without the approval of the lenders. None of the covenants of the Credit Facility negatively affect the Company’s liquidity or capital resources. Both the interest rate and commitment fee prices may increase if the Company’s leverage ratio reaches certain levels. Upon the occurrence of certain financial or economic events, significant corporate events, or certain other events of default constituting an event of default under the Credit Facility, all loans outstanding may be declared immediately due and payable and all commitments under the agreement may be terminated. The Company had no borrowings under the Credit Facility at September 30, 2014. The Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Credit Facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The Company’s Canadian subsidiary maintained a credit facility agreement (the Canadian Credit Facility) for the purpose of facilitating the settlement of mutual fund transactions. The amount of the facility was limited to $2,000 Canadian dollars or the equivalent amount in U.S. dollars. On June 9, 2014, the Company terminated the agreement. The Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Canadian Credit Facility during 2014.

Note 8.    Shareholders’ Equity
Stock-Based Compensation
On March 19, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the 2014 Plan), which was later approved by the shareholders of the Company on May 21, 2014. The 2014 Plan became effective upon receipt of the shareholders' approval on May 21, 2014 and is the successor equity compensation plan to the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the 2007 Plan) which was merged with and into the 2014 Plan. The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock units, stock awards, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based awards.

13 of 38



No further grants will be made under the 2007 Plan, and shares with respect to all grants outstanding under the 2007 Plan will be issued or transferred under the 2014 Plan. Permitted grantees under the 2014 Plan include employees, non-employee directors and consultants who perform services for the Company. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
The Company has only non-qualified stock options outstanding under the merged plan. All outstanding stock options have performance-based vesting provisions specific to each option grant that tie the vesting of the applicable stock options to the Company’s financial performance. The Company’s stock options vest at a rate of 50 percent when specified diluted earnings per share targets are achieved, and the remaining 50 percent when secondary, higher specified diluted earnings per share targets are achieved. The amount of stock-based compensation expense is based upon management’s estimate of when the earnings per share targets may be achieved.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense in its Consolidated Financial Statements in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as follows: 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Stock-based compensation expense
$
3,786

 
$
11,097

 
$
9,481

 
$
26,997

Less: Deferred tax benefit
(1,322
)
 
(4,125
)
 
(3,272
)
 
(9,908
)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
$
2,464

 
$
6,972

 
$
6,209

 
$
17,089

As of September 30, 2014, there was approximately $29,768 of unrecognized compensation cost remaining, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to unvested employee stock options that management expects will vest and is being amortized.
The Company issues new common shares associated with the exercise of stock options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $79,830. The total options exercisable as of September 30, 2014 had an intrinsic value of $175,270. The total intrinsic value for options exercisable is calculated as the difference between the market value of the Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2014 and the weighted average exercise price of the shares. The market value of the Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2014 was $36.16 as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC. The weighted average exercise price of the options exercisable as of September 30, 2014 was $19.49. Total options that were outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2014 were 19,535,000 and 10,516,000, respectively.
Common Stock Buyback
The Company’s Board of Directors, under multiple authorizations, has authorized the repurchase of the Company’s common stock on the open market or through private transactions. The Company purchased 6,305,000 shares at a total cost of $215,796 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The cost of stock purchases during the period includes the cost of certain transactions that settled in the following quarter. As of October 21, 2014, the Company has $65,274 of authorization remaining for the purchase of common stock under the program.
The Company immediately retires its common stock when purchased. Upon retirement, the Company reduces Capital in excess of par value for the average capital per share outstanding and the remainder is charged against Retained earnings. If the Company reduces its Retained earnings to zero, any subsequent purchases of common stock will be charged entirely to Capital in excess of par value.
Cash Dividend
On May 21, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.22 per share on the Company's common stock, which was paid on June 24, 2014, to shareholders of record on June 16, 2014. Cash dividends declared during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $36,980 and $34,400, respectively.


14 of 38



Note 9.    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows: 
 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investments
 
Total
Balance, January 1, 2014
$
101

 
$
1,386

 
$
1,487

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(4,896
)
 
407

 
(4,489
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 
7

 
7

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
(4,896
)
 
414

 
(4,482
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2014
$
(4,795
)
 
$
1,800

 
$
(2,995
)

Note 10.    Business Segment Information
The Company’s reportable business segments are:
Private Banks – provides investment processing and investment management programs to banks and trust institutions, independent wealth advisers and financial advisors worldwide;
Investment Advisors – provides investment management programs to affluent investors through a network of independent registered investment advisors, financial planners and other investment professionals in the United States;
Institutional Investors – provides investment management programs and administrative outsourcing solutions to retirement plan sponsors, hospitals and not-for-profit organizations worldwide;
Investment Managers – provides investment operations outsourcing solutions to fund companies, banking institutions and both traditional and non-traditional investment managers worldwide; and
Investments in New Businesses – focuses on providing investment management programs to ultra-high-net-worth families residing in the United States; developing internet-based investment services and advice solutions; entering new markets; and conducting other research and development activities.
The information in the following tables is derived from the Company’s internal financial reporting used for corporate management purposes. There are no inter-segment revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Management evaluates Company assets on a consolidated basis during interim periods. The accounting policies of the reportable business segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The following tables highlight certain unaudited financial information about each of the Company’s business segments for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
 
Private
Banks
 
Investment
Advisors
 
Institutional
Investors
 
Investment
Managers
 
Investments
In New
Businesses
 
Total
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
Revenues
$
110,147

 
$
74,469

 
$
72,560

 
$
63,640

 
$
1,231

 
$
322,047

Expenses
100,498

 
37,796

 
35,495

 
40,156

 
4,614

 
218,559

Operating profit (loss)
$
9,649

 
$
36,673

 
$
37,065

 
$
23,484

 
$
(3,383
)
 
$
103,488


 
Private
Banks
 
Investment
Advisors
 
Institutional
Investors
 
Investment
Managers
 
Investments
In New
Businesses
 
Total
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
Revenues
$
97,370

 
$
61,393

 
$
63,539

 
$
57,266

 
$
1,087

 
$
280,655

Expenses
95,579

 
33,768

 
33,058

 
37,763

 
4,146

 
204,314

Operating profit (loss)
$
1,791

 
$
27,625

 
$
30,481

 
$
19,503

 
$
(3,059
)
 
$
76,341


15 of 38



A reconciliation of the total operating profit reported for the business segments to income from operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows: 
 
2014
 
2013
Total operating profit from segments above
$
103,488

 
$
76,341

Corporate overhead expenses
(12,990
)
 
(14,402
)
Income from operations
$
90,498

 
$
61,939


The following tables provide additional information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 pertaining to our business segments: 
 
Capital Expenditures
 
Depreciation
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Private Banks
$
7,797

 
$
9,376

 
$
2,922

 
$
3,799

Investment Advisors
3,731

 
3,513

 
759

 
521

Institutional Investors
239

 
777

 
295

 
222

Investment Managers
3,115

 
1,596

 
907

 
525

Investments in New Businesses
498

 
186

 
511

 
442

Total from business segments
$
15,380

 
$
15,448

 
$
5,394

 
$
5,509

Corporate overhead
341

 
259

 
185

 
107

 
$
15,721

 
$
15,707

 
$
5,579

 
$
5,616


 
Amortization
 
2014
 
2013
Private Banks
$
6,342

 
$
5,704

Investment Advisors
2,341

 
2,105

Institutional Investors
363

 
326

Investment Managers
242

 
218

Investments in New Businesses
468

 
419

Total from business segments
$
9,756

 
$
8,772

Corporate overhead
57

 
57

 
$
9,813

 
$
8,829

The following tables highlight certain unaudited financial information about each of the Company’s business segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
 
Private
Banks
 
Investment
Advisors
 
Institutional
Investors
 
Investment
Managers
 
Investments
In New
Businesses
 
Total
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Revenues
$
329,508

 
$
210,939

 
$
212,211

 
$
187,099

 
$
3,491

 
$
943,248

Expenses
299,645

 
108,052

 
104,615

 
118,789

 
13,314

 
644,415

Operating profit (loss)
$
29,863

 
$
102,887

 
$
107,596

 
$
68,310

 
$
(9,823
)
 
$
298,833

Gain on sale of subsidiary
5,582

 

 

 

 

 
5,582

Total profit (loss)
$
35,445

 
$
102,887

 
$
107,596

 
$
68,310

 
$
(9,823
)
 
$
304,415


16 of 38



 
Private
Banks
 
Investment
Advisors
 
Institutional
Investors
 
Investment
Managers
 
Investments
In New
Businesses
 
Total
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Revenues
$
291,258

 
$
175,868

 
$
190,385

 
$
166,542

 
$
3,055

 
$
827,108

Expenses
289,632

 
98,291

 
97,595

 
109,432

 
11,774

 
606,724

Operating profit (loss)
$
1,626

 
$
77,577

 
$
92,790

 
$
57,110

 
$
(8,719
)
 
$
220,384

Gain on sale of subsidiary
22,112

 

 

 

 

 
22,112

Total profit (loss)
$
23,738

 
$
77,577

 
$
92,790

 
$
57,110

 
$
(8,719
)
 
$
242,496

A reconciliation of the total operating profit reported for the business segments to income from operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows: 
 
2014
 
2013
Total operating profit from segments above
$
298,833

 
$
220,384

Corporate overhead expenses
(36,313
)
 
(40,719
)
Noncontrolling interest reflected in segments

 
289

Income from operations
$
262,520

 
$
179,954


The following tables provide additional information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 pertaining to our business segments: 
 
Capital Expenditures
 
Depreciation
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Private Banks
$
26,105

 
$
26,079

 
$
10,211

 
$
11,679

Investment Advisors
11,381

 
9,480

 
1,762

 
1,547

Institutional Investors
3,169

 
1,921

 
714

 
674

Investment Managers
8,337

 
3,071

 
1,931

 
1,461

Investments in New Businesses
1,694

 
461

 
1,461

 
1,350

Total from business segments
$
50,686

 
$
41,012

 
$
16,079

 
$
16,711

Corporate Overhead
1,929

 
445

 
415

 
339

 
$
52,615

 
$
41,457

 
$
16,494

 
$
17,050

 
Amortization
 
2014
 
2013
Private Banks
$
18,485

 
$
16,497

Investment Advisors
6,825

 
6,063

Institutional Investors
1,058

 
937

Investment Managers
706

 
626

Investments in New Businesses
1,366

 
1,204

Total from business segments
$
28,440

 
$
25,327

Corporate Overhead
171

 
171

 
$
28,611

 
$
25,498


Note 11.    Income Taxes
The gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $13,557 and $12,028, respectively, exclusive of interest and penalties, of which $11,623 and $10,139 would affect the effective tax rate if the Company were to recognize the tax benefit.
The Company classifies interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on tax returns was $967 and $754, respectively.

17 of 38



 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest and penalties
$
13,557

 
$
12,028

Interest and penalties on unrecognized benefits
967

 
754

Total gross uncertain tax positions
$
14,524

 
$
12,782

Amount included in Current liabilities
$
3,254

 
$
4,175

Amount included in Other long-term liabilities
11,270

 
8,607

 
$
14,524

 
$
12,782

The Company’s effective tax rate was 34.7 percent and 28.5 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company's tax rate was 35.4 percent and 33.3 percent, respectively. The increase in the tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was due to the fact that the September 30, 2013 quarter was benefited by a Pennsylvania Tax Law change enacted on July 18, 2013. Accounting rules required the effect of the law change to be recorded in the quarter which the law was signed. The Company's effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was also impacted by the expiration of the research and development tax credit on December 31, 2013, whereas the Company's 2013 tax rate for the comparable period reflects the benefit of the tax credit for 2012 and 2013.
On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the Act) was signed into law which reinstated the research and development tax credit retroactively from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. Current accounting guidance requires the determination of current and deferred taxes be based upon the provisions of the enacted tax law as of the balance sheet date. Since the Act was not signed into law until January 2, 2013, the effect of the 2012 research and development tax credit was therefore reflected in the Company's 2013 tax rate. Since the research and development tax credit expired as of December 31, 2013, no credit was reflected in the Company's 2014 tax rate. The increase in tax rate was partially offset by an increase in the portion of pre-tax income in certain foreign jurisdictions which is taxed at a lower rate during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States on a consolidated basis and in many U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is subject to examination of income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for years before 2011 and is no longer subject to state, local or foreign income tax examinations by authorities for years before 2009.
The Company estimates it will recognize $3,254 of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months due to the expiration of the statute of limitations and resolution of income tax audits. These unrecognized tax benefits are related to tax positions taken on certain federal, state, and foreign tax returns. However, the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain, and the amounts ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ materially from the amounts accrued for each year. While it is reasonably possible that some issues under examination could be resolved in the next twelve months, based upon the current facts and circumstances, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of such resolution or total range of potential changes as it relates to the current unrecognized tax benefits that are recorded as part of the Company’s financial statements.

Note 12.    Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is party to various claims and legal proceedings.
SEI has been named in six lawsuits filed in Louisiana. Five lawsuits were filed in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana. One of the five actions purports to set forth claims on behalf of a class and also names SPTC as a defendant and, as described below, was certified as a class in December 2012. Two of the other actions also name SPTC as a defendant. All five actions name various defendants in addition to SEI, and, in all five actions, the plaintiffs purport to bring a cause of action against SEI and SPTC under the Louisiana Securities Act. The class action originally included a claim against SEI and SPTC for an alleged violation of the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act. Two of the other five actions include claims for violations of the Louisiana Racketeering Act and possibly conspiracy. In addition, another group of plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in the 23rd Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ascension, State of Louisiana, against SEI and SPTC and other defendants asserting claims of negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the uniform fiduciaries law, negligent misrepresentation, detrimental reliance, violations of the Louisiana Securities Act and Louisiana Racketeering Act and conspiracy. The underlying allegations in all the actions are purportedly related to the role of SPTC in providing back-office services to Stanford Trust Company. The petitions allege that SEI and SPTC aided and abetted or otherwise participated in the sale of “certificates of deposit” issued by Stanford International Bank.

18 of 38



Two of the five actions filed in East Baton Rouge were removed to federal court and transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On August 31, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order and judgment that the causes of action alleged against SEI in the two removed actions were preempted by federal law and the court dismissed these cases with prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed this ruling, and on March 19, 2012, a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court and remanded the actions for further proceedings. On July 18, 2012, SEI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, seeking review of the decision by the United States Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit to permit the claims against SEI to proceed. SEI believes that the trial court correctly concluded that the claims against SEI were barred by the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act and requested that the Supreme Court reinstate that dismissal. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari. On October 7, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on the appeal and on February 26, 2014 the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
The case filed in Ascension was also removed to federal court and transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to the Northern District of Texas. The schedule for responding to that complaint has not yet been established. The plaintiffs in the remaining two cases in East Baton Rouge have granted SEI and SPTC an extension to respond to the filings. SEI and SPTC filed exceptions in the class action pending in East Baton Rouge, which the Court granted in part and dismissed the claims under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act and denied in part as to the other exceptions.
SEI and SPTC filed an answer to the East Baton Rouge class action, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification; and SEI and SPTC also filed a motion for summary judgment against certain named plaintiffs which the Court stated would not be set for hearing until after the hearing on the class certification motion. The Court in the East Baton Rouge action held a hearing on class certification on September 20, 2012. By oral decision on December 5, 2012 and later entered in a judgment signed on December 17, 2012 that was subsequently amended, the Court in East Baton Rouge certified a class to be composed of persons who purchased or renewed any Stanford International Bank certificates of deposit (SIB CDs) in Louisiana between January 1, 2007 and February 13, 2009 or any person for whom the Stanford Trust Company purchased SIB CDs in Louisiana between January 1, 2007 and February 13, 2009. On January 30, 2013, SEI and SPTC filed motions for appeal from the judgments that stated SEI's and SPTC's intention to move to stay the litigation. On February 1, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion for Leave to File First Amended and Restated Class Action Petition in which they ask the Court to allow them to amend the petition in this case to add additional facts that were developed during discovery and adding claims against certain of SEI's insurance carriers. On February 5, 2013, the Court granted two of the motions for appeal and the motion for leave to amend. On February 15, 2013, SEI filed a motion for new trial, or, in the alternative, for reconsideration of the Court's order allowing amendment. On February 22, 2013, SEI filed a motion to stay proceedings in view of the pending Supreme Court case. On February 28, 2013, SEI responded to the First Amended and Restated Class Action Petition by filing an exception. On March 11, 2013, the insurance carrier defendants filed a notice of removal removing the case to the Middle District of Louisiana and on March 18, 2013, the insurance carrier defendants filed answers. On March 13, 2013, SEI notified the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) of this case as a potential tag-along action. On March 19, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand, a motion for expedited briefing schedule, expedited status conference and expedited consideration of their motion to remand, a motion for leave to file under seal and a motion for order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(b) requiring removing defendants to supplement federal court record with certified copy of state court record. These motions are now fully briefed. On March 25, 2013, SEI filed a motion that the court decline to adopt the state court's order regarding class certification, which the court dismissed without prejudice to renew upon a determination of removal jurisdiction in an April 12, 2013 order that also dismissed without prejudice a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue filed on April 9, 2013 by one of the insurers. On April 1, 2013, the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions (OFI) filed a motion to remand and sever claims, and a response to that motion by the insurers and opposition to that motion by the plaintiffs were filed on April 22, 2013. Along with the briefing in the Middle District of Louisiana, on March 13, 2013, SEI notified the MDL of this case as a potential tag-along action. On March 19, 2013, plaintiffs notified the MDL that they had filed a motion to remand and asked the panel to decline to issue a conditional transfer order. On March 29, 2013, the MDL issued a conditional transfer order (CTO). On April 18, 2013, OFI filed a motion to vacate the CTO or, in the alternative, stay any ruling to transfer the matter until after the Middle District of Louisiana ruled on OFI's motion to remand and sever. Plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate the CTO on April 19, 2013. SEI's responses to those motions were filed on May 9, 2013. On June 12, 2013, the MDL Panel issued an order notifying the parties that on July 25, 2013, it would consider, without oral argument, Plaintiffs' and OFI's motions to vacate the CTO. On August 7, 2013, the MDL Panel affirmed the CTO and transferred the matter against SEI to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; the MDL Panel also severed the claims against OFI and remanded those claims to the Middle District of Louisiana. On September 11, 2013, defendants filed a motion requesting a status conference with the Court to address the status of all pending motions. On October 4, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to review the MDL Panel’s transfer Order and on February 14, 2014, the Court denied the petition. On October 1, 2014, SEI filed a renewed motion to dismiss in the Northern District of Texas, and on October 6, 2014, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied the motion to remand. This case is

19 of 38



now pending in the Northern District of Texas. On October 16, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a Petition for Permission to Appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with respect to the denial by the District Court of the Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.
While the outcome of this litigation is uncertain given its early phase, SEI and SPTC believe that they have valid defenses to plaintiffs' claims and intend to defend the lawsuits vigorously. Because of the uncertainty of the make-up of the classes, the specific theories of liability that may survive a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, the lack of discovery regarding damages, causation, mitigation and other aspects that may ultimately bear upon loss, the Company is not reasonably able to provide an estimate of loss, if any, with respect to the foregoing lawsuits.
A lawsuit entitled Steven Curd and Rebel Curd v. SEI Investments Management Corporation was filed against SIMC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on December 11, 2013. On August 28, 2014, the Court granted SIMC’s motion to dismiss the initial complaint in the lawsuit, but also granted plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. On October 2, 2014, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In the amended complaint, SEI Investments Global Funds Services (SGFS) was added as a defendant. The plaintiffs bring the case as a shareholder derivative action against SIMC and SGFS on behalf of certain SEI funds. The claims are based on Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which allows shareholders of a mutual fund to sue the investment adviser of the fund or its affiliates for an alleged breach of fiduciary duty with respect to compensation received by the adviser or its affiliates. The plaintiffs have brought the suit against SIMC and SGFS with respect to five specific SEI Funds: the High Yield Bond, Tax-Managed Large Cap, and Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Funds, each of which is a series of the SEI Institutional Managed Trust, the Intermediate Term Municipal Fund, which is a series of the SEI Tax Exempt Trust, and the International Equity Fund, which is a series of the SEI Institutional International Trust (the SEI Funds). The plaintiffs seek: (1) damages for the SEI Funds in the amount of the alleged “excessive” fees earned by SIMC and SGFS beginning from the one year period prior to the filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs, and fees; (2) orders declaring that SIMC and SGFS allegedly violated Section 36(b) and enjoining SIMC and SGFS from further alleged violations; and (3) rescission of SIMC’s and SGFS’s contracts with the funds, and restitution of all allegedly excessive fees paid beginning from the one year period prior to the filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs, and fees. While the outcome of this litigation is uncertain given its early phase, SIMC and SGFS believe that they have valid defenses to plaintiffs' claims and intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously, and SIMC and SGFS are not reasonably able to provide an estimate of the ultimate loss, if any, with respect to this lawsuit.

Note 13.    Sale of SEI Asset Korea
On July 31, 2012, the Company, MetLife International Holdings, Inc. (MetLife) and International Finance Corporation (IFC) entered into a definitive agreement with Baring Asset Management Limited to sell all ownership interest in SEI Asset Korea (SEI AK). SEI AK was located in South Korea and provided domestic equity and fixed income investment management services to financial institutions and pension funds.
On March 28, 2013, all conditions subject to closing the transaction were satisfied and all ownership interests in SEI AK were transferred to Baring Asset Management Limited. The net working capital of SEI AK at closing in excess of required regulatory capital, and subject to certain other adjustments, was distributed to the Company, MetLife and IFC in accordance with the ownership interests. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $22,112, or $0.08 diluted earnings per share, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as a result of the sale. Under the terms of the agreement, a portion of the purchase price was paid upon closing with up to an additional $11,220 payable to the Company as a contingent purchase price with respect to three one-year periods ending on December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015 depending upon whether SEI AK achieves specified revenue measures during such periods. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $5,582, or $0.02 diluted earnings per share, with respect to the one-year period ended December 31, 2013 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company received the payment for this portion of the contingent purchase price in April 2014. The Company's gains from the sale of SEI AK are included in Gain on sale of subsidiary on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.

20 of 38



The operating results of SEI AK were included in the Private Banks business segment. SEI AK revenues and net income included in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations were as follows:
 
For the Period January 1, 2013 through March 28, 2013
 
 
 
Revenues
$
2,889

 
 
Net income
$
796

Less: Income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
(350
)
Net income attributable to SEI AK
$
446


Note 14.    Settlement Agreement
On April 24, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with respect to litigation captioned Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, et. al. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, et. al., brought by a group of plaintiffs, including the Company, related to the purchase of securities by the Company and others of Cheyne Finance LLC, a SIV security. In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the Company received a cash settlement payment of $43,429 after fees and expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2013. The income related to the cash settlement payment is reflected in Other income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

21 of 38




Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(In thousands, except asset balances and per share data)
This discussion reviews and analyzes the consolidated financial condition at September 30, 2014 and 2013, the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and other key factors that may affect future performance. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Overview
Consolidated Summary
We are a leading global provider of investment processing, investment management and investment operations solutions. We help corporations, financial institutions, financial advisors and ultra-high-net-worth families create and manage wealth by providing comprehensive, innovative, investment and investment-business solutions. Investment processing fees are earned as monthly fees for contracted services, including computer processing services, software licenses and investment operations services, as well as transaction-based fees for providing securities valuation and trade-execution. Investment operations and investment management fees are earned as a percentage of average assets under management or administration. As of September 30, 2014, through our subsidiaries and partnerships in which we have a significant interest, we manage or administer $612.2 billion in mutual fund and pooled or separately managed assets, including $249.1 billion in assets under management and $363.1 billion in client assets under administration. Our affiliate, LSV Asset Management (LSV), manages $81.5 billion of assets which are included as assets under management.
Our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were: 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent Change
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Revenues
$
322,047

 
$
280,655

 
15
%
 
$
943,248

 
$
827,108

 
14
 %
Expenses
231,549

 
218,716

 
6
%
 
680,728

 
647,154

 
5
 %
Income from operations
90,498

 
61,939

 
46
%
 
262,520

 
179,954

 
46
 %
Net (loss) gain from investments
(478
)
 
535

 
NM

 
49

 
638

 
NM

Interest income, net of interest expense
635

 
484

 
31
%
 
1,906

 
1,998

 
(5
)%
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
37,963

 
31,028

 
22
%
 
104,080

 
86,204

 
21
 %
Gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 
%
 
5,582

 
22,112

 
NM

Other income

 

 
%
 

 
43,429

 
NM

Income before income taxes
128,618

 
93,986

 
37
%
 
374,137

 
334,335

 
12
 %
Income taxes
44,635

 
26,791

 
67
%
 
132,521

 
111,376

 
19
 %
Net income
83,983

 
67,195

 
25
%
 
241,616

 
222,959

 
8
 %
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 
%
 

 
(350
)
 
NM

Net income attributable to SEI Investments Co.
$
83,983

 
$
67,195

 
25
%
 
241,616

 
$
222,609

 
9
 %
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.49

 
$
0.38

 
29
%
 
$
1.39

 
$
1.26

 
10
 %

The following items had a significant impact on our financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
Revenue growth was primarily driven by higher Asset management, administration and distribution fees from improved cash flows from new and existing clients and market appreciation. Our average assets under management, excluding LSV, increased $20.2 billion, or 14 percent, to $163.5 billion in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $143.3 billion during the first nine months of 2013. Our average assets under administration increased $54.5 billion, or 19 percent, to $348.3 billion in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $293.8 billion during the first nine months of 2013.
Sales of new business in our Institutional Investors and Investment Managers business segments as well as positive cash receipts from new and existing advisor relationships in our Investment Advisors business segment contributed to

22 of 38



the increase in our revenues and profits. Additionally, increased investment management fees from international clients in our Private Banks segment also contributed to our revenue growth.
Revenue growth was also driven by increased Information processing and software servicing fees in our Private Banks segment. The increase was primarily attributable to increased fees earned from our mutual fund trading solution and higher fees from the growth in assets processed on the SEI Wealth Platform and $6.0 million, or $.02 diluted earnings per share, in non-recurring professional services fees from a single project recorded in the second quarter 2014 related to investment processing services.
Our proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $105.0 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $86.9 million in the first nine months of 2013, an increase of 21 percent. The increase in earnings was primarily driven by the increase in assets under management from LSV's existing clients due to market appreciation and an increase in performance fees earned by LSV.
Stock-based compensation costs in the first nine months of 2014 declined by $17.5 million due to the acceleration of expense recognition during the comparable period of 2013 for stock options that achieved performance vesting targets earlier than originally estimated.
The direct costs associated with our investment management programs increased in our Private Banks, Investment Advisors and Institutional Investors segments. These costs primarily relate to fees charged by investment advisory firms and are included in Sub-advisory, distribution and other asset management costs on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Our operating expenses related to personnel and third-party service providers in our Private Banks and Investment Managers segments increased. These increased operational costs are mainly related to servicing new and existing clients and are included in Compensation, benefits and other personnel as well as Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We capitalized $26.2 million in the first nine months of 2014 for the SEI Wealth Platform as compared to $31.0 million in the first nine months of 2013. Included in the amount for 2013 is a one-time contractual payment of $8.8 million to exercise a conversion option in lieu of periodic fee payments pertaining to a software license. Amortization expense related to the Platform increased to $28.3 million during the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $25.0 million during the first nine months of 2013 due to continued releases of new functionality for the Platform.
Our operating margins in all four core business segments improved in the first nine months of 2014 mainly due to increased recurring revenues generated from the higher levels of assets under management and administration as previously discussed.
We recorded pre-tax gains of $5.6 million, or $.02 diluted earnings per share, and $22.1 million, or $.08 diluted earnings per share, from the sale of SEI Asset Korea (SEI AK) in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The gains from the sale are included in Gain on sale of subsidiary on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. The operating results of SEI AK were included in the Private Banks business segment (See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
We recorded income of $43.4 million, or $0.16 diluted earnings per share, during the second quarter 2013 from a cash settlement payment received pertaining to litigation related to the purchase of securities of Cheyne Finance LLC, a structured investment vehicle (SIV) security (See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
Our effective tax rate was 34.7 percent during the third quarter 2014 as compared to 28.5 percent during the third quarter 2013. Our effective tax rate during the first nine months of 2014 was 35.4 percent as compared to 33.3 percent in the first nine months of 2013. Our third quarter 2013 tax rate benefited by a one-time adjustment due to a Pennsylvania Tax Law change enacted on July 18, 2013. Our 2014 tax rate was also impacted by the expiration of the research and development tax credit on December 31, 2013, whereas the 2013 tax rate reflects the benefit for 2012 and 2013.
We continued our stock repurchase program during 2014 and purchased 6.3 million shares at an average price of approximately $34.22 per share in the nine month period.


23 of 38



Ending Asset Balances
(In millions)
This table presents ending assets of our clients, or of our clients’ customers, for which we provide management or administrative services through our subsidiaries and partnerships in which we have a significant interest.
 
As of September 30,
 
Percent Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
$
18,634

 
$
14,305

 
30
 %
Collective trust fund programs
11

 
11

 
 %
Liquidity funds
5,331

 
5,167

 
3
 %
Total assets under management
$
23,976

 
$
19,483

 
23
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
16,288

 
14,101

 
16
 %
Total assets
$
40,264

 
$
33,584

 
20
 %
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
42,260

 
36,203

 
17
 %
Collective trust fund programs
9

 
14

 
(36
)%
Liquidity funds
3,086

 
2,779

 
11
 %
Total assets under management
$
45,355

 
$
38,996

 
16
 %
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
72,006

 
64,429

 
12
 %
Collective trust fund programs
98

 
107

 
(8
)%
Liquidity funds
2,891

 
3,125

 
(7
)%
Total assets under management
$
74,995

 
$
67,661

 
11
 %
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
64

 
75

 
(15
)%
Collective trust fund programs
21,297

 
19,868

 
7
 %
Liquidity funds
1,018

 
678

 
50
 %
Total assets under management
$
22,379

 
$
20,621

 
9
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
346,841

 
295,959

 
17
 %
Total assets
$
369,220

 
$
316,580

 
17
 %
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
703

 
594

 
18
 %
Liquidity funds
118

 
26

 
354
 %
Total assets under management
$
821

 
$
620

 
32
 %
LSV:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
$
81,536

 
$
71,149

 
15
 %
Total:
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
215,203

 
186,755

 
15
 %
Collective trust fund programs
21,415

 
20,000

 
7
 %
Liquidity funds
12,444

 
11,775

 
6
 %
Total assets under management
$
249,062

 
$
218,530

 
14
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
363,129

 
310,060

 
17
 %
Total assets under management and administration
$
612,191

 
$
528,590

 
16
 %

24 of 38



Average Asset Balances
(In millions)
This table presents average asset balances of our clients, or of clients’ customers, for which we provide management or administrative services through our subsidiaries and partnerships in which we have a significant interest.
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent Change
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs (A)
$
18,804

 
$
13,696

 
37
 %
 
$
17,582

 
$
15,284

 
15
 %
Collective trust fund programs
12

 
11

 
9
 %
 
13

 
11

 
18
 %
Liquidity funds
5,466

 
5,142

 
6
 %
 
5,551

 
5,264

 
5
 %
Total assets under management
$
24,282

 
$
18,849

 
29
 %
 
$
23,146

 
$
20,559

 
13
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
15,707

 
13,760

 
14
 %
 
15,381

 
13,268

 
16
 %
Total assets
$
39,989

 
$
32,609

 
23
 %
 
$
38,527

 
$
33,827

 
14
 %
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
42,389

 
35,618

 
19
 %
 
40,760

 
34,546

 
18
 %
Collective trust fund programs
11

 
14

 
(21
)%
 
12

 
14

 
(14
)%
Liquidity funds
2,830

 
2,520

 
12
 %
 
2,758

 
2,211

 
25
 %
Total assets under management
$
45,230

 
$
38,152

 
19
 %
 
$
43,530

 
$
36,771

 
18
 %
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
72,010

 
63,153

 
14
 %
 
70,138

 
63,420

 
11
 %
Collective trust fund programs
98

 
107

 
(8
)%
 
112

 
104

 
8
 %
Liquidity funds
2,883

 
3,091

 
(7
)%
 
2,706

 
3,009

 
(10
)%
Total assets under management
$
74,991

 
$
66,351

 
13
 %
 
$
72,956

 
$
66,533

 
10
 %
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
64

 
76

 
(16
)%
 
67

 
73

 
(8
)%
Collective trust fund programs
22,123

 
19,259

 
15
 %
 
22,191

 
18,198

 
22
 %
Liquidity funds
962

 
613

 
57
 %
 
841

 
541

 
55
 %
Total assets under management
$
23,149

 
$
19,948

 
16
 %
 
$
23,099

 
$
18,812

 
23
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
344,661

 
292,627

 
18
 %
 
332,893

 
280,566

 
19
 %
Total assets
$
367,810

 
$
312,575

 
18
 %
 
$
355,992

 
$
299,378

 
19
 %
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
688

 
584

 
18
 %
 
650

 
564

 
15
 %
Liquidity funds
139

 
27

 
415
 %
 
76

 
33

 
130
 %
Total assets under management
$
827

 
$
611

 
35
 %
 
$
726

 
$
597

 
22
 %
LSV:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs
$
82,402

 
$
69,463

 
19
 %
 
$
79,525

 
$
66,747

 
19
 %
Total:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity and fixed income programs (A)
216,357

 
182,590

 
18
 %
 
208,722

 
180,634

 
16
 %
Collective trust fund programs
22,244

 
19,391

 
15
 %
 
22,328

 
18,327

 
22
 %
Liquidity funds
12,280

 
11,393

 
8
 %
 
11,932

 
11,058

 
8
 %
Total assets under management
$
250,881

 
$
213,374

 
18
 %
 
$
242,982

 
$
210,019

 
16
 %
Client proprietary assets under administration
360,368

 
306,387

 
18
 %
 
348,274

 
293,834

 
19
 %
Total assets under management and administration
$
611,249

 
$
519,761

 
18
 %
 
$
591,256

 
$
503,853

 
17
 %
(A) Equity and fixed income programs in the Private Banks segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 includes assets related to SEI AK which was sold during the first quarter 2013 (See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

25 of 38



In the preceding tables, assets under management are total assets of our clients or their customers invested in our equity and fixed-income investment programs, collective trust fund programs, and liquidity funds for which we provide asset management services. Assets under management and administration also include total assets of our clients or their customers for which we provide administrative services, including client proprietary fund balances for which we provide administration and/or distribution services. All assets presented in the preceding tables are not included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets because we do not own them.

Business Segments
Revenues, Expenses and Operating Profit (Loss) for our business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows: 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent
Change
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
110,147

 
$
97,370

 
13
%
 
$
329,508

 
$
291,258

 
13
%
Expenses
100,498

 
95,579

 
5
%
 
299,645

 
289,632

 
3
%
Operating Profit
$
9,649

 
$
1,791

 
NM

 
$
29,863

 
$
1,626

 
NM

Gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 
%
 
5,582

 
22,112

 
NM

Total Profit
$
9,649

 
$
1,791

 
NM

 
$
35,445

 
$
23,738

 
NM

Operating Margin (A)
9
%
 
2
%
 
 
 
9
%
 
1
%
 
 
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
74,469

 
$
61,393

 
21
%
 
$
210,939

 
$
175,868

 
20
%
Expenses
37,796

 
33,768

 
12
%
 
108,052

 
98,291

 
10
%
Operating Profit
$
36,673

 
$
27,625

 
33
%
 
$
102,887

 
$
77,577

 
33
%
Operating Margin
49
%
 
45
%
 
 
 
49
%
 
44
%
 
 
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
72,560

 
$
63,539

 
14
%
 
$
212,211

 
$
190,385

 
11
%
Expenses
35,495

 
33,058

 
7
%
 
104,615

 
97,595

 
7
%
Operating Profit
$
37,065

 
$
30,481

 
22
%
 
$
107,596

 
$
92,790

 
16
%
Operating Margin
51
%
 
48
%
 
 
 
51
%
 
49
%
 
 
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
63,640

 
$
57,266

 
11
%
 
$
187,099

 
$
166,542

 
12
%
Expenses
40,156

 
37,763

 
6
%
 
118,789

 
109,432

 
9
%
Operating Profit
$
23,484

 
$
19,503

 
20
%
 
$
68,310

 
$
57,110

 
20
%
Operating Margin
37
%
 
34
%
 
 
 
37
%
 
34
%
 
 
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
$
1,231

 
$
1,087

 
13
%
 
$
3,491

 
$
3,055

 
14
%
Expenses
4,614

 
4,146

 
11
%
 
13,314

 
11,774

 
13
%
Operating Loss
$
(3,383
)
 
$
(3,059
)
 
NM

 
$
(9,823
)
 
$
(8,719
)
 
NM

(A) Percentages determined exclusive of gain from sale of subsidiary.
For additional information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

26 of 38



Private Banks
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent
Change
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Percent
Change
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Information processing and software servicing fees
$
69,325

 
$
64,226

 
8
 %
 
$
213,053

 
$
190,564

 
12
 %
Asset management, administration & distribution fees
35,291

 
26,723

 
32
 %
 
98,576

 
79,593

 
24
 %
Transaction-based and trade execution fees
5,531

 
6,421

 
(14
)%
 
17,879

 
21,101

 
(15
)%
Total revenues
$
110,147

 
$
97,370

 
13
 %
 
$
329,508

 
$
291,258

 
13
 %
Revenues increased $12.8 million, or 13 percent, in the three month period and increased $38.3 million, or 13 percent, in the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and were primarily affected by:
Increased investment management fees from existing international clients due to higher average assets under management from improved capital markets and increased net cash flows, net of the decrease in fees from the sale of SEI AK in the first quarter 2013;
$6.0 million in non-recurring professional services fees from a single project recorded in the second quarter 2014 related to investment processing services;
Increased fees earned on our mutual fund trading solution due to an increase in assets processed on the system from new and existing clients; and
Increased recurring investment processing fees from new investment processing clients as well as higher fees from the growth in existing client assets processed on the SEI Wealth Platform; partially offset by
Lower recurring investment processing fees due to price reductions provided to existing clients that recontracted for longer periods and client losses.
Operating margin was nine percent in the three and nine month periods. Operating income increased by $7.9 million in the three month period and increased by $28.2 million in the nine month period and was primarily affected by:
An increase in revenues;
Decreased stock-based compensation costs; and
A reduction in operational expenses, mainly personnel, due to the sale of SEI AK in the first quarter 2013; partially offset by
Increased direct expenses associated with increased investment management fees from existing international clients;
Increased non-capitalized development costs, mainly personnel costs, related to the SEI Wealth Platform;
Increased operational costs, mainly salary and consulting costs, for servicing investment processing clients; and
Increased amortization expense related to the SEI Wealth Platform due to continued releases.
Investment Advisors
Revenues increased $13.1 million, or 21 percent, in the three month period and increased $35.1 million, or 20 percent, in the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and were primarily affected by:
Increased investment management fees from existing clients due to higher average assets under management caused by market appreciation and an increase in net cash flows from new and existing advisors; and
An increase in the average basis points earned on assets due to the increase in average assets under management and product mix.
Operating margin increased to 49 percent compared to 45 percent in the three month period and increased to 49 percent compared to 44 percent in the nine month period. Operating income increased by $9.0 million, or 33 percent, in the three month period and increased by $25.3 million, or 33 percent, in the nine month period and was primarily affected by:
An increase in revenues; and
Decreased stock-based compensation costs; partially offset by
Increased direct expenses associated with increased investment management fees from existing clients;
Increased personnel costs, mainly salary, for servicing new advisors,

27 of 38



Increased non-capitalized development costs, mainly personnel costs, related to the SEI Wealth Platform; and
Increased amortization expense related to the SEI Wealth Platform due to continued releases.

Institutional Investors
Revenues increased $9.0 million, or 14 percent, in the three month period and increased $21.8 million, or 11 percent, in the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and were primarily affected by:
Increased investment management fees from existing clients due to higher average assets under management caused by improved capital markets as well as additional asset funding from existing clients; and
Asset funding from new sales of our retirement and not-for-profit solutions; partially offset by client losses.
Operating margins increased to 51 percent compared to 48 percent in the three month period and increased to 51 percent compared to 49 percent in the nine month period. Operating income increased $6.6 million, or 22 percent, in the three month period and increased $14.8 million, or 16 percent, in the nine month period and was primarily affected by:
An increase in revenues; and
Decreased stock-based compensation costs; partially offset by
Increased direct expenses associated with higher investment management fees, and
Increased personnel costs, mainly salary and incentive-based compensation expenses.
Investment Managers
Revenues increased $6.4 million, or 11 percent, in the three month period and increased $20.6 million, or 12 percent, in the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and were primarily affected by:
Net positive cash flows from existing clients due to new funding along with higher valuations from improved capital markets; and
Positive cash flows from new clients; partially offset by client losses.
Operating margin increased to 37 percent compared to 34 percent in the three and nine month periods. Operating income increased $4.0 million, or 20 percent, in the three month period and increased $11.2 million, or 20 percent, in the nine month period and was primarily affected by:
An increase in revenues; and
Decreased stock-based compensation costs; partially offset by
Increased personnel expenses, technology and other operational costs to service new and existing clients.

Other
Corporate overhead expenses
Corporate overhead expenses primarily consist of general and administrative expenses and other costs not directly attributable to a reportable business segment. Corporate overhead expenses were $13.0 million and $14.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $36.3 million and $40.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in corporate overhead expenses in the both comparable periods was primarily due to decreased stock-based compensation costs.
Other income and expense
Other income and expense items on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of: 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net (loss) gain from investments
$
(478
)
 
$
535

 
$
49

 
$
638

Interest and dividend income
750

 
679

 
2,248

 
2,420

Interest expense
(115
)
 
(195
)
 
(342
)
 
(422
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
37,963

 
31,028

 
104,080

 
86,204

Gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 
5,582

 
22,112

Other income

 

 

 
43,429

Total other income and expense items, net
$
38,120

 
$
32,047

 
$
111,617

 
$
154,381


28 of 38



Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates primarily includes our less than 50 percent ownership in LSV. In April 2013, our interest in LSV was reduced from approximately 39.8 percent to approximately 39.3 percent.
Our proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $38.2 million in third quarter 2014 as compared to $31.3 million in third quarter 2013, an increase of 22 percent. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $105.0 million as compared to $86.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 21 percent. The increase in earnings was primarily due to increased assets under management from LSV's existing clients due to improved capital markets and an increase in performance fees. LSV’s average assets under management increased $12.8 billion to $79.5 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to $66.7 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of 19 percent. Our earnings from LSV, however, were negatively impacted by the decrease in our ownership interest in April 2013.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates also includes our proportionate share in the losses of Gao Fu, a wealth services firm based in Shanghai in the Republic of China. Our investment in Gao Fu at September 30, 2014 was $11.9 million. Our investment in Gao Fu resulted from a series of cash purchases of common stock and the outstanding unpaid principal balance pertaining to a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Agreement). The Note Agreement permits us to convert, at our discretion under certain conditions, the outstanding unpaid principal and interest balance into additional common shares of Gao Fu. If converted, our equity ownership interest in Gao Fu would increase based on a conversion rate formula as prescribed in the Note Agreement which could result in acquiring a majority ownership position in Gao Fu as well as evaluating the recoverability of the investment in Gao Fu (See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
Gain on sale of subsidiary
We recorded gains of $5.6 million and $22.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from the the sale of our ownership interests in SEI AK. These gains are included in Gain on sale of subsidiary on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations (See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).
Other income
On April 24, 2013, we entered into a Settlement Agreement with respect to litigation captioned Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, et. al. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, et. al., related to the purchase of Cheyne Finance LLC, a SIV security. In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, we received a cash settlement payment after fees and expenses of $43.4 million in the second quarter 2013 which is included in Other income on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations (See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information). 
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 34.7 percent and 28.5 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, our effective tax rate was 35.4 percent and 33.3 percent, respectively. The increase in our tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was due to the fact that the September 30, 2013 quarter was benefited by a Pennsylvania Tax Law change enacted on July 18, 2013. Accounting rules required the effect of the law change to be recorded in the quarter which the law was signed. Our tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was also impacted by the expiration of the research and development tax credit on December 31, 2013, whereas our 2013 tax rate for the comparable period reflects the benefit of the tax credit for 2012 and 2013.
Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of our financial assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of our financial assets are determined using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs and consist mainly of investments in equity or fixed-income mutual funds that are quoted daily and Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and other U.S. government agency securities that are single issuer pools that are valued based on current market data of similar assets (See Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Regulatory Matters
Like many firms operating within the financial services industry, we are experiencing a difficult regulatory environment across our markets. Our current scale and reach as a provider to the financial services industry, the introduction and implementation of new solutions for our financial services industry clients, the increased regulatory oversight of the financial services industry generally, new laws and regulations affecting the financial services industry and ever-changing regulatory interpretations of existing laws and regulations, and a greater propensity of regulators to pursue enforcement actions and other sanctions against regulated entities, have made this an increasingly challenging and costly regulatory environment in which to operate.

29 of 38



SEI and some of our regulated subsidiaries have undergone or been scheduled to undergo a range of periodic or thematic reviews, examinations or investigations by more than eight regulatory authorities around the world, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom (FCA), the Central Bank of Ireland and others. In a number of instances, these are the first recurring examinations by these regulatory authorities. These regulatory activities typically result in the identification of matters or practices to be addressed by us or our subsidiaries and, in certain circumstances, the regulatory authorities could require remediation activities or pursue enforcement proceedings against us or our subsidiaries. As described under the caption “Regulatory Considerations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, the range of possible sanctions that are available to regulatory authorities include limitations on our ability to engage in business for specified periods of time, the revocation of registration, censures and fines. The direct and indirect costs of responding to these regulatory activities and of complying with new or modified regulations, as well as the potential financial costs and potential reputational impact against us of any enforcement proceedings that might result, is uncertain but could have a material adverse impact on our operating results or financial position.

Liquidity and Capital Resources 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
240,895

 
$
240,295

Net cash used in investing activities
(45,981
)
 
(49,940
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(195,273
)
 
(115,388
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(359
)
 
74,967

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
578,273

 
452,247

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
577,914

 
$
527,214

Cash requirements and liquidity needs are primarily funded through our cash flow from operations and our capacity for additional borrowing. At September 30, 2014, our unused sources of liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents and the amount available under our credit facility.
Our credit facility provides for borrowings of up to $300.0 million and is scheduled to expire in February 2017 (See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The availability of the credit facility is subject to compliance with certain covenants set forth in the agreement. The credit facility contains covenants which restrict our ability to engage in mergers, consolidations, asset sales, investments, transactions with affiliates, or to incur liens, as defined in the agreement. In the event of a default under the credit facility, we would also be restricted from paying dividends on, or repurchasing, our common stock. Currently, our ability to borrow from the credit facility is not limited by any covenant of the agreement. We currently have no borrowings under our credit facility.
The majority of our excess cash reserves are primarily placed in accounts located in the United States that invest entirely in SEI-sponsored money market mutual funds denominated in the U.S. dollar. We also utilize demand deposit accounts or money market accounts at several well-established financial institutions located in the United States. Accounts used to manage these excess cash reserves do not impose any restrictions or limitations that would prevent us from being able to access such cash amounts immediately. As of October 21, 2014, the amount of cash and cash equivalents considered free and immediately accessible for other general corporate purposes was $435.6 million.
Our cash and cash equivalents include accounts managed by our subsidiaries and minority-owned subsidiaries that are used in their operations or to cover specific business and regulatory requirements. The availability of this cash for other purposes beyond the operations of these subsidiaries may be limited. Also, some of our foreign subsidiaries may have excess cash reserves which are considered to be undistributed earnings and indefinitely reinvested. Upon distribution of these earnings, in the form of dividends or otherwise, we would be immediately subject to both U.S. and foreign withholding taxes which would reduce the amount we would ultimately realize. We do not include accounts of our foreign subsidiaries in our calculation of free and immediately accessible cash for other general corporate purposes.
Cash flows from operations increased slightly in the first nine months of 2014 compared to the first nine months of 2013. Our cash flows from operations increased primarily due to the increase in our net income and the non-cash adjustments related to the gains from the sale of SEI AK and deferred tax expense. These increases were offset by the net change in our working capital accounts and the non-cash adjustment for stock-based compensation.

30 of 38



Cash flows from investing activities increased $4.0 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared to the first nine months of 2013. Net cash used in investing activities includes:
Purchases, sales and maturities of marketable securities. Our purchases, sales and maturities of marketable securities in the first nine months of 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
Purchases
$
(42,305
)
 
$
(48,653
)
Sales and maturities
45,357

 
36,746

Net investing activities from marketable securities
3,052

 
(11,907
)
Sales and maturities during the first nine months of 2014 include sales of $18.0 million of GNMA securities and corresponding purchases of $18.7 million of similar GNMA securities with shorter-term maturities. Our investments in GNMA securities are held to satisfy applicable regulatory requirements of SPTC.
The capitalization of costs incurred in developing computer software. We will continue the development of the SEI Wealth Platform through a series of releases to expand the functionality of the Platform. We capitalized $26.2 million of software development costs in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $31.0 million in the first nine months of 2013. Included in the amount for 2013 is a one-time contractual payment of $8.8 million to exercise a conversion option in lieu of periodic fee payments pertaining to a software license for the Platform.
Capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures in the first nine months of 2014 were $26.4 million as compared to $10.4 million in the first nine months of 2013. Our expenditures in 2014 primarily include purchased software and equipment for our data center operations. Our expenditures in 2014 also include approximately $8.0 million for the expansion of our corporate headquarters which was completed in the third quarter.
The sale of our subsidiary. The sale of SEI AK was completed during the first three months of 2013. Prior to the transaction, cash and cash equivalents held in the accounts of SEI AK were not considered free and immediately available. As a result of the sale, the net cash proceeds received significantly increased our amount of cash considered free and immediately accessible for other general corporate purposes. The net effect of the cash received from the sale of SEI AK and the transfer of cash balances to the owners is reflected in Sale of subsidiary, net of cash transferred. Our first payment related to the contingent purchase price of SEI AK was received in April 2014. Additional information pertaining to the sale is presented in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash flows from financing activities decreased $79.9 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared to the first nine months of 2013. Net cash used in financing activities includes:
The repurchase of our common stock. Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of our common stock through multiple authorizations. Currently, there is no expiration date for our common stock repurchase program. We purchased 6.3 million shares at a total cost of $215.8 million during the first nine months of 2014 and 4.9 million shares at a total cost of $144.1 million during the first nine months of 2013 for the repurchase of our common stock.
Proceeds from the issuance of our common stock. We received $81.4 million in proceeds from the issuance of our common stock during the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $54.8 million during the first nine months of 2013. The increase in proceeds is primarily attributable to a higher level of stock option exercise activity.
Dividend payments. Cash dividends paid were $74.3 million in the first nine months of 2014 as compared to $34.4 million in the first nine months of 2013. Dividends paid in 2014 includes the semi-annual dividends declared in December 2013 and May 2014 whereas dividends paid in 2013 only includes the semi-annual dividend declared in May 2013.
We believe our operating cash flow, available borrowing capacity, and existing cash and cash equivalents should provide adequate funds for ongoing operations; continued investment in new products and equipment; our common stock repurchase program and future dividend payments.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangement
On October 1, 2012, we provided an unsecured guaranty of the obligations of LSV Employee Group III to The PrivateBank and Trust Company and certain other lenders. We entered into this agreement in order to facilitate the acquisition of certain partnership interests of LSV by LSV Employee Group III. Additional information pertaining to the agreement is presented in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

31 of 38



Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Certain information contained in this discussion is or may be considered forward-looking. Forward-looking statements relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions that involve certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change. Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable, they could be inaccurate. Our actual future revenues and income could differ materially from our expected results. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
Among the risks and uncertainties which may affect our future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments are those risks described in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K in Part I, Item 1A. These risks include the following:
changes in capital markets that may affect our revenues and earnings;
risk of failure by a third-party service provider;
product development risk;
poor investment performance of our mutual funds and other investment products;
the affect on our earnings from the performance of LSV Asset Management;
the affect of extensive governmental regulation;
litigation and regulatory examinations and investigations;
consolidation within our target markets, including consolidations between banks and other financial institutions;
systems and technology risks;
data security risks;
third party approval of our investment products with advisors affiliated with independent broker-dealers or other networks;
operational risks associated with the processing of investment transactions;
financial and non-financial covenants which may restrict our ability to manage liquidity needs;
changes in, or interpretation of, accounting principles or tax rules and regulations;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
fluctuations in interest rates affecting the value of our fixed-income investment securities; and
retention of senior management personnel.
Our principal, regulated wholly-owned subsidiaries are SEI Investments Distribution Co., or SIDCO, SEI Investments Management Corporation, or SIMC, SEI Private Trust Company, or SPTC, SEI Trust Company, or STC, and SEI Investments (Europe) Limited, or SIEL. SIDCO is a broker-dealer registered with the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA). SIMC is an investment advisor registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) under the Commodity Futures Exchange Act. SPTC is a limited purpose federal thrift chartered and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. STC is a Pennsylvania trust company, regulated by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities. SIEL is an investment manager and financial institution subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority of the United Kingdom. In addition, various SEI subsidiaries are subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory authorities in Canada, the Republic of Ireland and other foreign countries. The Company has a minority ownership interest in LSV, which is also an investment advisor registered with the SEC.
The Company, its regulated subsidiaries, their regulated services and solutions and their customers are all subject to extensive legislation, regulation and supervision that recently has been subject to, and continues to experience, significant change and increased regulatory activity. These changes and regulatory activities could have a material adverse affect on us and our clients.
The various governmental agencies and self-regulatory authorities that regulate or supervise the Company and various of its subsidiaries have broad administrative powers. In the event of a failure to comply with laws, regulations and requirements of these agencies and authorities, the possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on our ability to engage in business for specified periods of time, the revocation of applicable registration as a broker-dealer, investment advisor or other regulated entity, and, as the case may be, censures and fines. Additionally, certain securities and banking laws applicable to us and our subsidiaries provide for certain private rights of action that could give rise to civil litigation. Any litigation could have significant financial and non-financial consequences including monetary judgments and the requirement to take action or limit activities that could ultimately affect our business.

32 of 38



Governmental scrutiny from regulators, legislative bodies and law enforcement agencies with respect to matters relating to our regulated subsidiaries and their activities, services and solutions, our business practices, our past actions and other matters has increased dramatically in the past several years. Responding to these examinations, investigations, actions and lawsuits, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the proceeding, is time consuming and expensive and can divert the time and effort of our senior management from our business. Penalties and fines sought by regulatory authorities have increased substantially over the last several years, and certain regulators have been more likely in recent years to commence enforcement actions or to advance or support legislation targeted at the financial services industry. Governmental scrutiny and legal and enforcement proceedings can also have a negative impact on our reputation and on the morale and performance of our employees, which could adversely affect our businesses and results of operations.
We are subject to the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which contains anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires implementation of regulations applicable to financial services companies, including standards for verifying client identification and monitoring client transactions and detecting and reporting suspicious activities. Anti-money laundering laws outside the United States contain similar requirements. We offer investment and banking solutions that also are subject to regulation by the federal and state securities and banking authorities, as well as foreign regulatory authorities, where applicable. Existing or future regulations that affect these solutions could lead to a reduction in sales of these solutions or require modifications of these solutions.
Compliance with existing and future regulations and responding to and complying with recent increased regulatory activity affecting broker-dealers, investment advisors, investment companies, financial institutions and their service providers could have a significant impact on us. We periodically undergo regulatory examinations and respond to regulatory inquiries and document requests. In addition, recent legislative activity in the United States (including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and attendant rule making activities) and in other jurisdictions (including the European Union and the United Kingdom) have made and continue to make, extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms. As a result of these examinations, inquiries and requests, as a result of increased civil litigation activity, and as a result of these new laws and regulations, we engage legal counsel, review our compliance procedures, solution and service offerings, and business operations, and make changes as we deem necessary. These additional activities and required changes may result in increased expense or may reduce revenues.
Our bank clients are subject to supervision by federal and state banking authorities concerning the manner in which such clients purchase and receive our products and services. Our plan sponsor clients and our subsidiaries providing services to those clients are subject to supervision by the Department of Labor and compliance with employee benefit regulations. Investment advisor and broker-dealer clients are regulated by the SEC, state securities authorities, or FINRA. Existing or future regulations applicable to our clients may affect our clients’ purchase of our products and services.
In addition, see the discussion of governmental regulations in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the risks that proposed regulatory changes may present for our business.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Information required by this item is set forth under the captions "Our revenues and earnings are affected by changes in capital markets" and "Changes in interest rates may affect the value of our fixed-income investment securities" in Item 1A "Risk Factors" and under the caption "Sensitivity of our revenues and earnings to capital market fluctuations" in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to this information as it is disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2013.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls systems are met,

33 of 38



and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
(b) Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34 of 38



PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.
SEI has been named in six lawsuits filed in Louisiana. Five lawsuits were filed in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana. One of the five actions purports to set forth claims on behalf of a class and also names SPTC as a defendant and, as described below, was certified as a class in December 2012. Two of the other actions also name SPTC as a defendant. All five actions name various defendants in addition to SEI, and, in all five actions, the plaintiffs purport to bring a cause of action against SEI and SPTC under the Louisiana Securities Act. The class action originally included a claim against SEI and SPTC for an alleged violation of the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act. Two of the other five actions include claims for violations of the Louisiana Racketeering Act and possibly conspiracy. In addition, another group of plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in the 23rd Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ascension, State of Louisiana, against SEI and SPTC and other defendants asserting claims of negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, violations of the uniform fiduciaries law, negligent misrepresentation, detrimental reliance, violations of the Louisiana Securities Act and Louisiana Racketeering Act and conspiracy. The underlying allegations in all the actions are purportedly related to the role of SPTC in providing back-office services to Stanford Trust Company. The petitions allege that SEI and SPTC aided and abetted or otherwise participated in the sale of “certificates of deposit” issued by Stanford International Bank.
Two of the five actions filed in East Baton Rouge were removed to federal court and transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On August 31, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order and judgment that the causes of action alleged against SEI in the two removed actions were preempted by federal law and the court dismissed these cases with prejudice. Plaintiffs appealed this ruling, and on March 19, 2012, a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court and remanded the actions for further proceedings. On July 18, 2012, SEI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, seeking review of the decision by the United States Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit to permit the claims against SEI to proceed. SEI believes that the trial court correctly concluded that the claims against SEI were barred by the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act and requested that the Supreme Court reinstate that dismissal. On January 18, 2013, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari. On October 7, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on the appeal and on February 26, 2014 the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
The case filed in Ascension was also removed to federal court and transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to the Northern District of Texas. The schedule for responding to that complaint has not yet been established. The plaintiffs in the remaining two cases in East Baton Rouge have granted SEI and SPTC an extension to respond to the filings. SEI and SPTC filed exceptions in the class action pending in East Baton Rouge, which the Court granted in part and dismissed the claims under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act and denied in part as to the other exceptions.
SEI and SPTC filed an answer to the East Baton Rouge class action, plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification; and SEI and SPTC also filed a motion for summary judgment against certain named plaintiffs which the Court stated would not be set for hearing until after the hearing on the class certification motion. The Court in the East Baton Rouge action held a hearing on class certification on September 20, 2012. By oral decision on December 5, 2012 and later entered in a judgment signed on December 17, 2012 that was subsequently amended, the Court in East Baton Rouge certified a class to be composed of persons who purchased or renewed any Stanford International Bank certificates of deposit (SIB CDs) in Louisiana between January 1, 2007 and February 13, 2009 or any person for whom the Stanford Trust Company purchased SIB CDs in Louisiana between January 1, 2007 and February 13, 2009. On January 30, 2013, SEI and SPTC filed motions for appeal from the judgments that stated SEI's and SPTC's intention to move to stay the litigation. On February 1, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion for Leave to File First Amended and Restated Class Action Petition in which they ask the Court to allow them to amend the petition in this case to add additional facts that were developed during discovery and adding claims against certain of SEI's insurance carriers. On February 5, 2013, the Court granted two of the motions for appeal and the motion for leave to amend. On February 15, 2013, SEI filed a motion for new trial, or, in the alternative, for reconsideration of the Court's order allowing amendment. On February 22, 2013, SEI filed a motion to stay proceedings in view of the pending Supreme Court case. On February 28, 2013, SEI responded to the First Amended and Restated Class Action Petition by filing an exception. On March 11, 2013, the insurance carrier defendants filed a notice of removal removing the case to the Middle District of Louisiana and on March 18, 2013, the insurance carrier defendants filed answers. On March 13, 2013, SEI notified the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) of this case as a potential tag-along action. On March 19, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand, a motion for expedited briefing schedule, expedited status conference and expedited consideration of their motion to remand, a motion for leave to file under seal and a motion for order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(b) requiring removing defendants to supplement federal court record with certified copy of state court record. These motions are now fully briefed. On March 25, 2013, SEI filed a motion that the court decline to adopt the state court's order regarding class certification, which the court dismissed

35 of 38



without prejudice to renew upon a determination of removal jurisdiction in an April 12, 2013 order that also dismissed without prejudice a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue filed on April 9, 2013 by one of the insurers. On April 1, 2013, the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions (OFI) filed a motion to remand and sever claims, and a response to that motion by the insurers and opposition to that motion by the plaintiffs were filed on April 22, 2013. Along with the briefing in the Middle District of Louisiana, on March 13, 2013, SEI notified the MDL of this case as a potential tag-along action. On March 19, 2013, plaintiffs notified the MDL that they had filed a motion to remand and asked the panel to decline to issue a conditional transfer order. On March 29, 2013, the MDL issued a conditional transfer order (CTO). On April 18, 2013, OFI filed a motion to vacate the CTO or, in the alternative, stay any ruling to transfer the matter until after the Middle District of Louisiana ruled on OFI's motion to remand and sever. Plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate the CTO on April 19, 2013. SEI's responses to those motions were filed on May 9, 2013. On June 12, 2013, the MDL Panel issued an order notifying the parties that on July 25, 2013, it would consider, without oral argument, Plaintiffs' and OFI's motions to vacate the CTO. On August 7, 2013, the MDL Panel affirmed the CTO and transferred the matter against SEI to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; the MDL Panel also severed the claims against OFI and remanded those claims to the Middle District of Louisiana. On September 11, 2013, defendants filed a motion requesting a status conference with the Court to address the status of all pending motions. On October 4, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to review the MDL Panel’s transfer Order and on February 14, 2014, the Court denied the petition. On October 1, 2014, SEI filed a renewed motion to dismiss in the Northern District of Texas, and on October 6, 2014, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied the motion to remand. This case is now pending in the Northern District of Texas. On October 16, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a Petition for Permission to Appeal with the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit with respect to the denial by the District Court of the Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.
While the outcome of this litigation is uncertain given its early phase, SEI and SPTC believe that they have valid defenses to plaintiffs' claims and intend to defend the lawsuits vigorously. Because of the uncertainty of the make-up of the classes, the specific theories of liability that may survive a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, the lack of discovery regarding damages, causation, mitigation and other aspects that may ultimately bear upon loss, the Company is not reasonably able to provide an estimate of loss, if any, with respect to the foregoing lawsuits.
A lawsuit entitled Steven Curd and Rebel Curd v. SEI Investments Management Corporation was filed against SIMC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on December 11, 2013. On August 28, 2014, the Court granted SIMC’s motion to dismiss the initial complaint in the lawsuit, but also granted plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. On October 2, 2014, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In the amended complaint, SEI Investments Global Funds Services (SGFS) was added as a defendant. The plaintiffs bring the case as a shareholder derivative action against SIMC and SGFS on behalf of certain SEI funds. The claims are based on Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, which allows shareholders of a mutual fund to sue the investment adviser of the fund or its affiliates for an alleged breach of fiduciary duty with respect to compensation received by the adviser or its affiliates. The plaintiffs have brought the suit against SIMC and SGFS with respect to five specific SEI Funds: the High Yield Bond, Tax-Managed Large Cap, and Tax-Managed Small/Mid Cap Funds, each of which is a series of the SEI Institutional Managed Trust, the Intermediate Term Municipal Fund, which is a series of the SEI Tax Exempt Trust, and the International Equity Fund, which is a series of the SEI Institutional International Trust (the SEI Funds). The plaintiffs seek: (1) damages for the SEI Funds in the amount of the alleged “excessive” fees earned by SIMC and SGFS beginning from the one year period prior to the filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs, and fees; (2) orders declaring that SIMC and SGFS allegedly violated Section 36(b) and enjoining SIMC and SGFS from further alleged violations; and (3) rescission of SIMC’s and SGFS’s contracts with the funds, and restitution of all allegedly excessive fees paid beginning from the one year period prior to the filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs, and fees. While the outcome of this litigation is uncertain given its early phase, SIMC and SGFS believe that they have valid defenses to plaintiffs' claims and intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously, and SIMC and SGFS are not reasonably able to provide an estimate of the ultimate loss, if any, with respect to this lawsuit.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors.
Information regarding risk factors appears in Part I – Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2013.


36 of 38



Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(e)
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $2.478 billion worth of our common stock through multiple authorizations. Currently, there is no expiration date for our common stock repurchase program.
Information regarding the repurchase of common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2014 is as follows: 
Period
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Program
 
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Program
July 1 – 31, 2014
75,000

 
$
35.81

 
75,000

 
$
137,817,000

August 1 – 31, 2014
770,000

 
36.40

 
770,000

 
109,791,000

September 1 – 30, 2014
1,200,000

 
37.10

 
1,200,000

 
65,274,000

Total
2,045,000

 
36.79

 
2,045,000

 
 

Item 6.    Exhibits.
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of the Form 10-Q. 
31.1
  
Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
 
31.2
  
Rule 13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
 
32
  
Section 1350 Certifications.
 
 
99.1
 
Press release dated October 22, 2014 of SEI Investments Company related to the Company's financial and operating results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2014.
 
 
 
101.INS
  
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

37 of 38



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
 
 
SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
 
 
 
 
Date:
 
October 23, 2014
 
By:
 
/s/ Dennis J. McGonigle
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dennis J. McGonigle
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer


38 of 38
SEIC-9.30.14-Ex 31.1


Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Alfred P. West, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SEI Investments Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: October 23, 2014
/s/ Alfred P. West, Jr.
Alfred P. West, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



SEIC-9.30.14-Ex 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Dennis J. McGonigle, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SEI Investments Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: October 23, 2014
/s/ Dennis J. McGonigle
Dennis J. McGonigle
Chief Financial Officer




SEIC-9.30.14-Ex 32
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Alfred P. West, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Dennis J. McGonigle, Chief Financial Officer, of SEI Investments Company, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
October 23, 2014
 
Date:
October 23, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Alfred P. West, Jr.
 
/s/ Dennis J. McGonigle
Alfred P. West, Jr.
 
Dennis J. McGonigle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


SEIC-9.30.14-Ex 99.1

Exhibit 99.1



Investor Contact:                         Media Contact:
Nicole Vattimo                            Dana Grosser
SEI    SEI
+1 610-676-4385                        +1 610-676-2459
nvattimo@seic.com                         dgrosser@seic.com
Pages:        8

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SEI REPORTS THIRD-QUARTER 2014 FINANCIAL RESULTS
EPS Increases 29 Percent on Revenue Increase of 15 Percent
 
OAKS, Pa., October 22, 2014 -- SEI Investments Company (NASDAQ:SEIC) today announced financial results for the third-quarter 2014. Diluted earnings per share were $.49 in third-quarter 2014 compared to $.38 in third-quarter 2013. Our tax rate during third-quarter 2014 was 34.7 percent compared to 28.5 percent in third-quarter 2013. This differential in our tax rate equates to a positive impact of $.03 diluted earnings per share to our third-quarter 2013 earnings.
Consolidated Overview
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands, except earnings per share)
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 

$322,047

 

$280,655

 
15%
 
$
943,248

 
$
827,108

 
14%
Net income attributable to SEI
 
83,983

 
67,195

 
25%
 
241,616

 
222,609

 
9%
Diluted earnings per share
 

$0.49

 

$0.38

 
29%
 

$1.39

 

$1.26

 
10%
"Third-quarter results reflect ongoing progress across all of our business segments," said Alfred P. West, Jr., SEI Chairman and CEO. "SEI's continued success reflects our clients' recognition of the value of our solutions. Our financial results affirm the strength of our diversified portfolio of offerings, and, as always, we remain committed to long-term sustainable growth and increasing shareholder value."







Summary of Third-Quarter Results by Business Segment
(In thousands)
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
%
 
2014
 
2013
 
%
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 

$110,147

 

$97,370

 
13%
 

$329,508

 

$291,258

 
13%
   Expenses
 
100,498

 
95,579

 
5%
 
299,645

 
289,632

 
3%
   Operating Profit
 
9,649

 
1,791

 
NM
 
29,863

 
1,626

 
NM
   Gain on sale of subsidiary
 

 

 
—%
 
5,582

 
22,112

 
NM
   Total Profit
 
9,649

 
1,791

 
NM
 

$35,445

 

$23,738

 
NM
   Operating Margin (A)
 
9
%
 
2
%
 
 
 
9
%
 
1
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 
74,469

 
61,393

 
21%
 
210,939

 
175,868

 
20%
   Expenses
 
37,796

 
33,768

 
12%
 
108,052

 
98,291

 
10%
   Operating Profit
 
36,673

 
27,625

 
33%
 
102,887

 
77,577

 
33%
   Operating Margin
 
49
%
 
45
%
 
 
 
49
%
 
44
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 
72,560

 
63,539

 
14%
 
212,211

 
190,385

 
11%
   Expenses
 
35,495

 
33,058

 
7%
 
104,615

 
97,595

 
7%
   Operating Profit
 
37,065

 
30,481

 
22%
 
107,596

 
92,790

 
16%
   Operating Margin
 
51
%
 
48
%
 
 
 
51
%
 
49
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 
63,640

 
57,266

 
11%
 
187,099

 
166,542

 
12%
   Expenses
 
40,156

 
37,763

 
6%
 
118,789

 
109,432

 
9%
   Operating Profit
 
23,484

 
19,503

 
20%
 
68,310

 
57,110

 
20%
   Operating Margin
 
37
%
 
34
%
 
 
 
37
%
 
34
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 
1,231

 
1,087

 
13%
 
3,491

 
3,055

 
14%
   Expenses
 
4,614

 
4,146

 
11%
 
13,314

 
11,774

 
13%
   Operating Loss
 
(3,383
)
 
(3,059
)
 
NM
 
(9,823
)
 
(8,719
)
 
NM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Totals:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Revenues
 

$322,047

 

$280,655

 
15%
 

$943,248

 

$827,108

 
14%
   Expenses
 
218,559

 
204,314

 
7%
 
644,415

 
606,724

 
6%
   Corporate overhead expenses
 
12,990

 
14,402

 
(10)%
 
36,313

 
40,719

 
(11)%
   NCI reflected in segments
 

 

 
—%
 

 
(289
)
 
NM
   Income from operations
 

$90,498

 

$61,939

 
46%
 

$262,520

 

$179,954

 
46%

(A) Percentages determined exclusive of gain on sale of subsidiary.

2



Third-Quarter Business Highlights:

Revenues increased in third-quarter 2014 as compared to both third-quarter 2013 and second-quarter 2014. Revenue growth was primarily driven by higher Asset management, administration, and distribution fees from market appreciation and improved cash flows from new and existing clients. Our average assets under management, excluding LSV, increased $24.6 billion, or 17 percent, to $168.5 billion in the third-quarter 2014, as compared to $143.9 billion during the third-quarter 2013, and increased $4.1 billion, or three percent, as compared to $164.3 billion during the second-quarter 2014.
Our average assets under administration increased $54.0 billion, or 18 percent, to $360.4 billion in the third-quarter 2014, as compared to $306.4 billion during the third-quarter 2013, and increased $11.9 billion, or three percent, as compared to $348.4 billion during the second-quarter 2014 (see attached Ending and Average Asset Balances schedules for further details).
Revenue growth was also driven by increased information processing fees in our Private Banks segment. The increase was primarily attributable to higher fees from the growth in assets processed on the SEI Wealth PlatformSM.
Sales events, net of client losses, during third-quarter 2014 totaled approximately $27.5 million and are expected to generate net annualized recurring revenues of approximately $25.6 million when contract values are fully realized.
All four core business segments realized revenue and profit margin growth as compared to third-quarter 2013 results. Operating margins in all four core business segments improved primarily from increased recurring revenues generated from the higher levels of assets under management and administration.
Income from LSV increased $6.9 million, or 22 percent, to $38.2 million in third-quarter 2014 as compared to $31.3 million in third-quarter 2013 due to an increase in assets under management from market appreciation and an increase in performance fees earned by LSV.
Stock-based compensation expense during the third-quarter 2014 decreased by $7.3 million primarily due to the acceleration of expense recognition during the comparable period of 2013 for stock options that achieved performance vesting targets earlier than originally estimated.
Amortization expense related to capitalized software increased to $9.8 million during the third-quarter 2014 as compared to $8.8 million during the third-quarter 2013 due to continued releases of the SEI Wealth PlatformSM.
The effective tax rates were 34.7 percent in third-quarter 2014, 28.5 percent in third-quarter 2013, and 35.7 percent in second-quarter 2014. Our third-quarter 2013 tax rate benefited by a one-time adjustment due to a Pennsylvania Tax Law change enacted on July 18, 2013.
In third-quarter 2014, we repurchased 2.0 million shares of our common stock for $75.2 million.

3



Earnings Conference Call
A conference call to review earnings is scheduled for 2 p.m. Eastern time on October 22, 2014. Investors may listen to the call at seic.com/investors. The call may also be accessed at many financial services websites, including Google Finance and Yahoo Finance. Investors may also listen to replays at these websites, or by telephone at (USA) 800-475-6701; (International) 320-365-3844, access code 339136.

About SEI
SEI (NASDAQ:SEIC) is a leading global provider of investment processing, investment management, and investment operations solutions that help corporations, financial institutions, financial advisors, and ultra-high-net-worth families create and manage wealth. As of September 30, 2014, through its subsidiaries and partnerships in which the company has a significant interest, SEI manages or administers $612 billion in mutual fund and pooled or separately managed assets, including $249 billion in assets under management and $363 billion in client assets under administration. For more information, visit seic.com.



Many of the statements in this release may be considered “forward looking statements” and include discussions about future operations, strategies and financial results. Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control or are subject to change. Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable, they could be inaccurate. Our actual future revenues and income could differ materially from our expected results. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.




4



SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset management, admin. and distribution fees
 

$244,704

 

$208,780

 

$705,966

 

$611,135

Information processing and software servicing fees
 
70,020

 
64,606

 
215,026

 
191,606

Transaction–based and trade execution fees
 
7,323

 
7,269

 
22,256

 
24,367

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenues
 
322,047

 
280,655

 
943,248

 
827,108

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subadvisory, distribution and other asset mgmt costs
 
39,737

 
31,209

 
110,993

 
88,795

Software royalties and other information processing costs
 
8,562

 
7,541

 
25,532

 
22,912

Brokerage commissions
 
5,119

 
5,519

 
16,217

 
18,291

Compensation, benefits and other personnel
 
94,316

 
89,311

 
281,210

 
264,636

Stock-based compensation
 
3,786

 
11,097

 
9,481

 
26,997

Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees
 
34,946

 
33,367

 
103,283

 
98,667

Data processing and computer related
 
13,555

 
12,654

 
39,553

 
37,028

Facilities, supplies and other costs
 
16,136

 
13,573

 
49,354

 
47,280

Amortization
 
9,813

 
8,829

 
28,611

 
25,498

Depreciation
 
5,579

 
5,616

 
16,494

 
17,050

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total expenses
 
231,549

 
218,716

 
680,728

 
647,154

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operations
 
90,498

 
61,939

 
262,520

 
179,954

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) gain on investments
 
(478
)
 
535

 
49

 
638

Interest and dividend income
 
750

 
679

 
2,248

 
2,420

Interest expense
 
(115
)
 
(195
)
 
(342
)
 
(422
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
 
37,963

 
31,028

 
104,080

 
86,204

Gain on sale of subsidiary
 

 

 
5,582

 
22,112

Other income
 

 

 

 
43,429

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes
 
128,618

 
93,986

 
374,137

 
334,335

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income taxes
 
44,635

 
26,791

 
132,521

 
111,376

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
83,983

 
67,195

 
241,616

 
222,959

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
 

 

 

 
(350
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to SEI
 

$83,983

 

$67,195

 

$241,616

 

$222,609

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common share
 

$0.50

 

$0.39

 

$1.43

 

$1.29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares used to calculate basic earnings per share
 
167,925

 
171,308

 
168,612

 
172,043

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per common share
 

$0.49

 

$0.38

 

$1.39

 

$1.26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share
 
172,905

 
176,043

 
173,700

 
176,036





5



SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
 
2014
 
2013
Assets
 
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 

$577,914

 

$578,273

Restricted cash
 
5,500

 
5,500

Receivables from regulated investment companies
 
46,533

 
39,364

Receivables, net
 
211,228

 
186,664

Securities owned
 
21,173

 
21,133

Other current assets
 
21,028

 
16,166

Total Current Assets
 
883,376

 
847,100

 
 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment, net
 
128,775

 
118,995

Capitalized software, net
 
310,368

 
312,615

Investments available for sale
 
81,084

 
83,323

Trading securities
 
4,908

 
4,849

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
 
63,858

 
61,370

Other assets, net
 
13,410

 
10,917

Total Assets
 

$1,485,779

 

$1,439,169

 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
 

$6,512

 

$16,235

Accrued liabilities
 
148,839

 
188,123

Deferred income taxes, net
 
1,868

 
1,653

Deferred revenue
 
1,098

 
1,977

Total Current Liabilities
 
158,317

 
207,988

 
 
 
 
 
Deferred income taxes
 
71,552

 
66,572

Other long-term liabilities
 
11,270

 
8,607

Total Liabilities
 
241,139

 
283,167

 
 
 
 
 
Shareholders' Equity:
 
 
 
 
Common stock
 
1,671

 
1,692

Capital in excess of par value
 
805,197

 
721,219

Retained earnings
 
440,767

 
431,604

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net
 
(2,995
)
 
1,487

Total Shareholders' Equity
 
1,244,640

 
1,156,002

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
 

$1,485,779

 

$1,439,169




6



SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
ENDING ASSET BALANCES
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Sept. 30,
 
Dec 31,
 
Mar. 31,
 
Jun. 30,
 
Sept. 30,
 
 
 
2013
 
2013
 
2014
 
2014
 
2014
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$14,305

 

$15,472

 

$16,918

 

$18,679

 

$18,634

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
11

 
14

 
14

 
12

 
11

Liquidity funds
 
 
5,167

 
5,685

 
5,670

 
5,274

 
5,331

Total assets under management
 
 

$19,483

 

$21,171

 

$22,602

 

$23,965

 

$23,976

Client assets under administration
 
 
14,101

 
15,272

 
15,641

 
15,347

 
16,288

Total assets
 
 

$33,584

 

$36,443

 

$38,243

 

$39,312

 

$40,264

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$36,203

 

$38,574

 

$39,981

 

$42,125

 

$42,260

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
14

 
11

 
13

 
13

 
9

Liquidity funds
 
 
2,779

 
2,846

 
2,802

 
2,696

 
3,086

Total assets under management
 
 

$38,996

 

$41,431

 

$42,796

 

$44,834

 

$45,355

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$64,429

 

$66,548

 

$69,194

 

$71,598

 

$72,006

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
107

 
109

 
102

 
100

 
98

Liquidity funds
 
 
3,125

 
2,644

 
2,505

 
2,414

 
2,891

Total assets under management
 
 

$67,661

 

$69,301

 

$71,801

 

$74,112

 

$74,995

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$75

 

$69

 

$68

 

$64

 

$64

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
19,868

 
22,377

 
22,633

 
22,598

 
21,297

Liquidity funds
 
 
678

 
718

 
782

 
802

 
1,018

Total assets under management
 
 

$20,621

 

$23,164

 

$23,483

 

$23,464

 

$22,379

Client assets under administration (A)
 
 
295,959

 
311,992

 
326,735

 
337,492

 
346,841

Total assets
 
 

$316,580

 

$335,156

 

$350,218

 

$360,956

 

$369,220

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$594

 

$619

 

$632

 

$659

 

$703

Liquidity funds
 
 
26

 
46

 
49

 
38

 
118

Total assets under management
 
 

$620

 

$665

 

$681

 

$697

 

$821

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LSV Asset Management:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$71,149

 

$76,189

 

$77,973

 

$82,026

 

$81,536

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs (B)
 
 

$186,755

 

$197,471

 

$204,766

 

$215,151

 

$215,203

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
20,000

 
22,511

 
22,762

 
22,723

 
21,415

Liquidity funds
 
 
11,775

 
11,939

 
11,808

 
11,224

 
12,444

Total assets under management
 
 

$218,530

 

$231,921

 

$239,336

 

$249,098

 

$249,062

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Client assets under administration (C)
 
 
310,060

 
327,264

 
342,376

 
352,839

 
363,129

Total assets
 
 

$528,590

 

$559,185

 

$581,712

 

$601,937

 

$612,191

(A)
Client assets under administration in the Investment Managers segment include $52.5 billion of assets balances that require limited services and therefore are at fee levels below our normal full service assets (as of September 30, 2014).
(B)
Equity/Fixed Income programs include $5.1 billion of assets invested in various asset allocation funds at September 30, 2014.
(C)
In addition to the numbers presented, SEI also administers an additional $6.7 billion in Funds of Funds assets (as of
September 30, 2014) on which SEI does not earn an administration fee.



7



SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY
AVERAGE ASSET BALANCES
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
3rd Qtr.
 
4th Qtr.
 
1st Qtr.
 
2nd Qtr.
 
3rd Qtr.
 
 
 
2013
 
2013
 
2014
 
2014
 
2014
Private Banks:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$13,696

 

$14,901

 

$16,114

 

$17,829

 

$18,804

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
11

 
11

 
14

 
12

 
12

Liquidity funds
 
 
5,142

 
5,218

 
5,757

 
5,429

 
5,466

Total assets under management
 
 

$18,849

 

$20,130

 

$21,885

 

$23,270

 

$24,282

Client assets under administration
 
 
13,760

 
14,702

 
15,366

 
15,069

 
15,707

Total assets
 
 

$32,609

 

$34,832

 

$37,251

 

$38,339

 

$39,989

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Advisors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$35,618

 

$37,520

 

$39,005

 

$40,887

 

$42,389

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
14

 
13

 
13

 
13

 
11

Liquidity funds
 
 
2,520

 
2,785

 
2,806

 
2,637

 
2,830

Total assets under management
 
 

$38,152

 

$40,318

 

$41,824

 

$43,537

 

$45,230

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Institutional Investors:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$63,153

 

$65,750

 

$67,697

 

$70,706

 

$72,010

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
107

 
110

 
103

 
134

 
98

Liquidity funds
 
 
3,091

 
2,720

 
2,571

 
2,664

 
2,883

Total assets under management
 
 

$66,351

 

$68,580

 

$70,371

 

$73,504

 

$74,991

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment Managers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$76

 

$75

 

$68

 

$68

 

$64

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
19,259

 
21,345

 
22,004

 
22,447

 
22,123

Liquidity funds
 
 
613

 
592

 
738

 
824

 
962

Total assets under management
 
 

$19,948

 

$22,012

 

$22,810

 

$23,339

 

$23,149

Client assets under administration
 
 
292,627

 
303,131

 
320,644

 
333,373

 
344,661

Total assets
 
 

$312,575

 

$325,143

 

$343,454

 

$356,712

 

$367,810

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in New Businesses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$584

 

$613

 

$623

 

$640

 

$688

Liquidity funds
 
 
27

 
33

 
46

 
43

 
139

Total assets under management
 
 

$611

 

$646

 

$669

 

$683

 

$827

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LSV Asset Management:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$69,463

 

$75,240

 

$76,306

 

$79,866

 

$82,402

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity/Fixed Income programs
 
 

$182,590

 

$194,099

 

$199,813

 

$209,996

 

$216,357

Collective Trust Fund programs
 
 
19,391

 
21,479

 
22,134

 
22,606

 
22,244

Liquidity funds
 
 
11,393

 
11,348

 
11,918

 
11,597

 
12,280

Total assets under management
 
 

$213,374

 

$226,926

 

$233,865

 

$244,199

 

$250,881

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Client assets under administration
 
 
306,387

 
317,833

 
336,010

 
348,442

 
360,368

Total assets
 
 

$519,761

 

$544,759

 

$569,875

 

$592,641

 

$611,249





8